From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-202.mailbox.org (mout-p-202.mailbox.org [80.241.56.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F02CE31E859 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 07:04:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787641466; cv=none; b=qk93tsbNu7d946GtLE9eipU7t4dLNoNolYNhEZzHlRptrevDXk/iDyHgBzEratp0up9wBiSQwBSKUGTAlC3GhV9zw8Fa84JCgws0JzUBuWEvE9p2AnDykdwiwWn+UjUX/qe4e7NnTMyFDmzD8tC4WiIB00rMVcp5OklZrM2mCeg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787641466; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MdTHrdzDKU4zkSmOZpBoCwCfjAolKAs1YcxVVDY25+w=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=d8Z8hR3nGNPAFlrsVbeIDavjBPnQ5AyBT8ffHmvtUur+qVt9LKvvBWhGms6Fkw9XnJDcjX7AWMOm9wEAVvd3+XgE0Yr1IpEIIDdPzAhb63n6ovbzXdq+y+uMxoQkdK6wSf48eLGLOUEnYaL9QQIeE+CT+Vsqbm6fWP8ChC/c9X8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=QWYPSP2U; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="QWYPSP2U" Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [10.196.197.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-202.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4hTf0D3xMlzMlGx; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:04:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1787641452; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uOP/hLg2FQ8M+cMhsdxEmpQUHtNFWueP+7aSMa7zd1c=; b=QWYPSP2UO6otNe3YMTN3sCLarwEMbEq+g8J7zz0n0vYHwQqiCTWi6Oqk2v1BRnMnEuBKAk 9PtZhH3c4l3JJl48W51ojmXhRL/iRWcSRo0Q6DUhR4yDnsFTgXpnuhLiXzyF1eC27ftwTM AgOBKPzckx2vS8mGWB8Zy/99eSl2YPRT/PWWOg8vfrNKWZrkttfkw3+cVkcBkq7UuS5ecr zKZn+qB8qIkwOpyPnvwg62hj5EfnKvZBYVmX3FLcLX7X/b0yvpmt54gkIszRzbFadIviFc /LgTU29hHJ7Von4pdys3taryFvbws1UtBKx4Q79r+/3dGzFFuQDWdgjOENhb3w== Message-ID: <80fa7da564cc13783063b892d0fa06752ec55bdf.camel@mailbox.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sched: Fix incorrect test description in drm_sched_basic_cases From: Philipp Stanner Reply-To: phasta@kernel.org To: oushixiong1025@163.com, Matthew Brost Cc: Danilo Krummrich , Philipp Stanner , Christian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shixiong Ou Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:04:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20260821084733.541572-1-oushixiong1025@163.com> References: <20260821084733.541572-1-oushixiong1025@163.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MBO-RS-META: e6bh5hazirmez4zhhdujyq646q31qs48 X-MBO-RS-ID: 8e113bed2184f043dbe +Cc Marco, Tvrtko On Fri, 2026-08-21 at 16:47 +0800, oushixiong1025@163.com wrote: > From: Shixiong Ou >=20 > The second test case in drm_sched_basic_cases[] has num_entities =3D 1 > but its description claims "across multiple entities".=C2=A0 Fix it to > accurately reflect that the dependency chain operates within a single > entity. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Shixiong Ou Thx for the patch. Applied to drm-misc-next. Tvrtko, added you for awareness. Maybe this indicates a gap in the test coverage as you originally envisioned it? P. > --- > =C2=A0drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/tests_basic.c | 2 +- > =C2=A01 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/tests_basic.c b/drivers/gpu/= drm/scheduler/tests/tests_basic.c > index da5c4952780f..34bbb2c27913 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/tests_basic.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/tests_basic.c > @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static const struct drm_sched_basic_params drm_sched_ba= sic_cases[] =3D { > =C2=A0 .num_entities =3D 1, > =C2=A0 }, > =C2=A0 { > - .description =3D "A chain of dependent jobs across multiple entities", > + .description =3D "A chain of dependent jobs in a single entity", > =C2=A0 .queue_depth =3D 100, > =C2=A0 .job_us =3D 1000, > =C2=A0 .num_entities =3D 1,