From: murtuja bharmal <murtuja_bharmal@yahoo.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6 kernel module compilation without using KBUILD
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:40:32 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <815347.48604.qm@web36702.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0711280453330.3612@localhost.localdomain>
--- "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, murtuja bharmal wrote:
>
> > Hello Sam,
> >
> > My intention is to just understand whole process
> of making kernel
> > module. Actually I am working on one project in
> which I have to port
> > lots of 2.4 kernel module in 2.6 kernel. So I
> thought lets first try
> > to understand, what is going behind KBUILD. I also
> gone through
> > linux/Documentation/kbuild/ but didn't get very
> much information.
> > Even after running it on Verbose Mode, I am not
> very much clear.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Murtuja Bharmal
>
> you'd probably be better off asking this on the
> kernel newbies list
> rather than the main kernel list. and, as an intro
> to porting 2.4 to
> 2.6 modules, you might want to start here:
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/driver-porting/
>
> and, as others have suggested, you're probably
> better off just
> figuring out the 2.6 kbuild structure. trying to do
> this manually
> without kbuild is just making this way more
> difficult than it has to
> be.
>
> rday
>
>
========================================================================
> Robert P. J. Day
> Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel
> Pedantry
> Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
>
> http://crashcourse.ca
>
========================================================================
>
Hello Robert,
I think I am not very much clear. Let me try to
clarify more.
My intention is not build or port kernel driver
without using KBUILD.
I know about driver porting and Writing makefile using
KBUILD.
I don't have any issue about that.
I just want understand the whole process for clearity
thats it.
unfortunately I didn't get any answer from linux-doc
and linux-admin about this issue.
Let me try to understand KBUILD internal architecture
more by self.
Any Way.
Thanks for your view.
Murtuja Bharmal
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better pen pal.
Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how. http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-28 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-28 8:09 Linux 2.6 kernel module compilation without using KBUILD murtuja bharmal
2007-11-28 9:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-11-28 9:53 ` murtuja bharmal
2007-11-28 9:56 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-11-28 10:40 ` murtuja bharmal [this message]
2007-11-28 10:59 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=815347.48604.qm@web36702.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
--to=murtuja_bharmal@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox