Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Fix i.MX8M enable flow to meet spec

[Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>]

Hello Frieder,

Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2023, 18:33:06 CEST schrieb Frieder Schrempf:
> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
> 
> According to the documentation [1] the proper enable flow is:
> 
> 1. Enable DSI link and keep data lanes in LP-11 (stop state)
> 2. Disable stop state to bring data lanes into HS mode
> 
> Currently we do this all at once within enable(), which doesn't
> allow to meet the requirements of some downstream bridges.
> 
> To fix this we now enable the DSI in pre_enable() and force it
> into stop state using the FORCE_STOP_STATE bit in the ESCMODE
> register until enable() is called where we reset the bit.
> 
> We currently do this only for i.MX8M as Exynos uses a different
> init flow where samsung_dsim_init() is called from
> samsung_dsim_host_transfer().
> 
> [1]
> https://docs.kernel.org/gpu/drm-kms-helpers.html#mipi-dsi-bridge-operation
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
> ---
> Changes for v2:
> * Drop RFC
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c index e0a402a85787..9775779721d9
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> @@ -859,6 +859,10 @@ static int samsung_dsim_init_link(struct samsung_dsim
> *dsi) reg = samsung_dsim_read(dsi, DSIM_ESCMODE_REG);
>  	reg &= ~DSIM_STOP_STATE_CNT_MASK;
>  	reg |= DSIM_STOP_STATE_CNT(driver_data->reg_values[STOP_STATE_CNT]);
> +
> +	if (!samsung_dsim_hw_is_exynos(dsi->plat_data->hw_type))
> +		reg |= DSIM_FORCE_STOP_STATE;
> +
>  	samsung_dsim_write(dsi, DSIM_ESCMODE_REG, reg);
> 
>  	reg = DSIM_BTA_TIMEOUT(0xff) | DSIM_LPDR_TIMEOUT(0xffff);
> @@ -1340,6 +1344,9 @@ static void samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable(struct
> drm_bridge *bridge, ret = samsung_dsim_init(dsi);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return;
> +
> +		samsung_dsim_set_display_mode(dsi);
> +		samsung_dsim_set_display_enable(dsi, true);
>  	}
>  }
> 
> @@ -1347,9 +1354,16 @@ static void samsung_dsim_atomic_enable(struct
> drm_bridge *bridge, struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>  	struct samsung_dsim *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
> +	u32 reg;
> 
> -	samsung_dsim_set_display_mode(dsi);
> -	samsung_dsim_set_display_enable(dsi, true);
> +	if (samsung_dsim_hw_is_exynos(dsi->plat_data->hw_type)) {
> +		samsung_dsim_set_display_mode(dsi);
> +		samsung_dsim_set_display_enable(dsi, true);
> +	} else {
> +		reg = samsung_dsim_read(dsi, DSIM_ESCMODE_REG);
> +		reg &= ~DSIM_FORCE_STOP_STATE;
> +		samsung_dsim_write(dsi, DSIM_ESCMODE_REG, reg);
> +	}
> 
>  	dsi->state |= DSIM_STATE_VIDOUT_AVAILABLE;
>  }
> @@ -1358,10 +1372,17 @@ static void samsung_dsim_atomic_disable(struct
> drm_bridge *bridge, struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>  	struct samsung_dsim *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
> +	u32 reg;
> 
>  	if (!(dsi->state & DSIM_STATE_ENABLED))
>  		return;
> 
> +	if (!samsung_dsim_hw_is_exynos(dsi->plat_data->hw_type)) {
> +		reg = samsung_dsim_read(dsi, DSIM_ESCMODE_REG);
> +		reg |= DSIM_FORCE_STOP_STATE;
> +		samsung_dsim_write(dsi, DSIM_ESCMODE_REG, reg);
> +	}
> +
>  	dsi->state &= ~DSIM_STATE_VIDOUT_AVAILABLE;
>  }

I know that this is necessary right now, but I don't like that 
'samsung_dsim_hw_is_exynos()' checks all over the place.

Despite that:
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> #TQMa8MxML/MBa8Mx

-- 
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
http://www.tq-group.com/