From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964808AbcHJSxF (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:53:05 -0400 Received: from mail.efficios.com ([78.47.125.74]:58532 "EHLO mail.efficios.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932704AbcHJSwj (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:52:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:04:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andrew Morton , Russell King , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel , linux-api , Paul Turner , Andrew Hunter , Andy Lutomirski , Andi Kleen , Dave Watson , Chris Lameter , Ben Maurer , rostedt , "Paul E. McKenney" , Josh Triplett , Linus Torvalds , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Michael Kerrisk , Boqun Feng Message-ID: <821822611.7093.1470837893291.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> In-Reply-To: <20160810133306.GO30192@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1469135662-31512-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20160803131940.GM6862@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <656745027.6624.1470773200334.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20160809213314.GK30192@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <427989454.6732.1470782507345.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20160810075044.GJ6879@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1431024781.7024.1470835564859.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20160810133306.GO30192@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 1/7] Restartable sequences system call MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [78.47.125.74] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.7.0_GA_1659 (ZimbraWebClient - FF45 (Linux)/8.7.0_GA_1659) Thread-Topic: Restartable sequences system call Thread-Index: A/ktgyanZD7tohHgv9t/ULbGEp3E5A== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ----- On Aug 10, 2016, at 9:33 AM, Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 01:26:04PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > >> static bool rseq_update_cpu_id_event_counter(struct task_struct *t) >> { >> union rseq_cpu_event u; >> >> u.e.cpu_id = raw_smp_processor_id(); >> u.e.event_counter = ++t->rseq_event_counter; >> if (__put_user(u.v, &t->rseq->u.v)) >> return false; >> trace_rseq_inc(t->rseq_event_counter); > > I had not previously noticed the trace_* muck, but I would suggest > passing in t and leaving it up to the tracepoint implementation to pick > out the value. OK, fixed. > > Also, since this not only increments (it also updates the cpu number) > the naming is 'wrong'. I'll rename the event to "rseq_update" then, and have two fields: cpu_id and event_counter. Thanks, Mathieu > >> return true; > > } -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com