Re: [PATCH 0/2] Update CascadelakeX and SkylakeX events list

["Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>]

Hi Arnaldo,

On 7/17/2020 2:06 PM, Jin, Yao wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 6/17/2020 3:38 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:27:40PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
>>> On 6/16/2020 2:16 PM, Ian Rogers wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:00 PM Jin, Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>> Can I get an ACK for this patchset?
>>>>> On 6/3/2020 10:18 AM, Jin Yao wrote:
>>>>>> This patchset updates CascadelakeX events to v1.08 and
>>>>>> updates SkylakeX events to v1.21.
>>
>>>>>> The events have been tested on CascadelakeX and SkylakeX
>>>>>> servers with latest perf/core branch.
>>
>>>> could you rebase this on Arnaldo's tmp.perf/core tree?
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=tmp.perf/core
>>>> I tried using git am but get:
>>>> Applying: perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08
>>>> error: patch fragment without header at line 279: @@ -213,14 +220,14 @@
>>>> error: could not build fake ancestor
>>>> Patch failed at 0001 perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>
>>> The patchset are applied OK on perf/core branch.
>>>
>>> As far as I understand, the patch for posting should be based on perf/core branch, is it right?
>>
>> Sorry, I've been testing with using tmp.perf/core as a way to more
>> quickly make available what I've processed, before I test it thoroughly
>> both with container builds and with manual testing, so the bleeding edge
>> is there, perf/core becoming a bit more stable, as I'll try not to
>> rebase it like before.
>>
>> - Arnaldo
>>
> 
> Can this event update be accepted?
> 
> Thanks
> Jin Yao

Can this event list update be accepted?

Thanks
Jin Yao