Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: Add HAMOA-IOT-SOM platform

[Yijie Yang <yijie.yang@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 2025-07-18 02:52, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 05:08:41PM +0800, Yijie Yang wrote:
>> The HAMOA-IOT-SOM is a compact computing module that integrates a System
>> on Chip (SoC) — specifically the x1e80100 — along with essential
>> components optimized for IoT applications. It is designed to be mounted on
>> carrier boards, enabling the development of complete embedded systems.
>>
>> This change enables and overlays the following components:
>> - Regulators on the SOM
>> - Reserved memory regions
>> - PCIe6a and its PHY
>> - PCIe4 and its PHY
>> - USB0 through USB6 and their PHYs
>> - ADSP, CDSP
>> - WLAN, Bluetooth (M.2 interface)
>>
>> Written with contributions from Yingying Tang (added PCIe4 and its PHY to
>> enable WLAN).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yijie Yang <yijie.yang@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-som.dtsi | 607 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 607 insertions(+)
>>
> 
>> +&remoteproc_adsp {
>> +	firmware-name = "qcom/hamoa-iot/adsp.mbn",
>> +			"qcom/hamoa-iot/adsp_dtb.mbn";
> 
> Is there a significant difference qcom/x1e80100/adsp.mbn ? If not, can
> we use that firmware?

I believe there are differences in firmware between it and the EVK, even 
if they’re minor. Therefore, it's better to maintain a dedicated folder 
for each board and move the code to the carrier board.

> 
>> +
>> +	status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&remoteproc_cdsp {
>> +	firmware-name = "qcom/hamoa-iot/cdsp.mbn",
>> +			"qcom/hamoa-iot/cdsp_dtb.mbn";
>> +
>> +	status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
> 

-- 
Best Regards,
Yijie