From: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
To: jianqi.ren.cn@windriver.com, wayne.lin@amd.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, harry.wentland@amd.com,
sunpeng.li@amd.com, Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com,
alexander.deucher@amd.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, Jerry.Zuo@amd.com,
zaeem.mohamed@amd.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] drm/amd/display: Don't refer to dc_sink in is_dsc_need_re_compute
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 11:43:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82d8db95-2f62-4124-aff8-424252f505df@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241209063637.3427088-1-jianqi.ren.cn@windriver.com>
Hi Jianqi,
On 09/12/24 12:06, jianqi.ren.cn@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit fcf6a49d79923a234844b8efe830a61f3f0584e4 ]
>
> [Why]
> When unplug one of monitors connected after mst hub, encounter null pointer dereference.
>
> It's due to dc_sink get released immediately in early_unregister() or detect_ctx(). When
> commit new state which directly referring to info stored in dc_sink will cause null pointer
> dereference.
>
> [how]
> Remove redundant checking condition. Relevant condition should already be covered by checking
> if dsc_aux is null or not. Also reset dsc_aux to NULL when the connector is disconnected.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jerry Zuo <jerry.zuo@amd.com>
> Acked-by: Zaeem Mohamed <zaeem.mohamed@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com>
> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jianqi Ren <jianqi.ren.cn@windriver.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
> index 1acef5f3838f..a1619f4569cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
> @@ -183,6 +183,8 @@ amdgpu_dm_mst_connector_early_unregister(struct drm_connector *connector)
> dc_sink_release(dc_sink);
> aconnector->dc_sink = NULL;
> aconnector->edid = NULL;
> + aconnector->dsc_aux = NULL;
> + port->passthrough_aux = NULL;
> }
>
> aconnector->mst_status = MST_STATUS_DEFAULT;
> @@ -487,6 +489,8 @@ dm_dp_mst_detect(struct drm_connector *connector,
> dc_sink_release(aconnector->dc_sink);
> aconnector->dc_sink = NULL;
> aconnector->edid = NULL;
> + aconnector->dsc_aux = NULL;
> + port->passthrough_aux = NULL;
>
> amdgpu_dm_set_mst_status(&aconnector->mst_status,
> MST_REMOTE_EDID | MST_ALLOCATE_NEW_PAYLOAD | MST_CLEAR_ALLOCATED_PAYLOAD,
This backport doesn't look right to me, can you please clarify these.
1. I think it is worth documenting in commit message just before your
SOB on why you don't need this hunk:
MST_REMOTE_EDID | MST_ALLOCATE_NEW_PAYLOAD |
MST_CLEAR_ALLOCATED_PAYLOAD,
@@ -1238,14 +1242,6 @@ static bool is_dsc_need_re_compute(
if (!aconnector || !aconnector->dsc_aux)
continue;
- /*
- * check if cached virtual MST DSC caps are
available and DSC is supported
- * as per specifications in their Virtual DPCD
registers.
- */
- if
(!(aconnector->dc_sink->dsc_caps.dsc_dec_caps.is_dsc_supported ||
-
aconnector->dc_link->dpcd_caps.dsc_caps.dsc_basic_caps.fields.dsc_support.DSC_PASSTHROUGH_SUPPORT))
- continue;
-
stream_on_link[new_stream_on_link_num] = aconnector;
new_stream_on_link_num++;
which is part of upstream, I understand that this is not in 6.1.y code,
if so is it even affected ?
2. Also commit message says:
""
Remove redundant checking condition. Relevant condition should already
be covered by checking if dsc_aux is null or not. Also reset dsc_aux to
NULL when the connector is disconnected.
""
but the if(!aconnector->dsc_aux) is not in 6.1.y, so something is
missing. Maybe 6.1.y is not affected or we need more backports to 6.1.y
to make them clean cherry-picks ?
Thanks,
Harshit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-09 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-09 6:36 [PATCH 6.1.y] drm/amd/display: Don't refer to dc_sink in is_dsc_need_re_compute jianqi.ren.cn
2024-12-09 6:13 ` Harshit Mogalapalli [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-11 10:01 jianqi.ren.cn
2024-12-11 10:15 jianqi.ren.cn
2024-12-12 12:11 ` Greg KH
2025-05-13 1:52 jianqi.ren.cn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82d8db95-2f62-4124-aff8-424252f505df@oracle.com \
--to=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
--cc=Jerry.Zuo@amd.com \
--cc=Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
--cc=jianqi.ren.cn@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sunpeng.li@amd.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
--cc=wayne.lin@amd.com \
--cc=zaeem.mohamed@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox