public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: xulang <xulang@uniontech.com>
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, dzm91@hust.edu.cn, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	haoluo@google.com, huyinhao@hust.edu.cn,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kaiyanm@hust.edu.cn,
	kernel@uniontech.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul.chaignon@gmail.com,
	sdf@fomichev.me, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v1] bpf: Fix OOB in bpf_obj_memcpy for cgroup storage
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 13:50:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <82ee475b-034a-442c-b290-cc7905a7f33c@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D3B60D7890B13875+reply-to-v1-review@uniontech.com>



On 3/16/26 6:51 AM, xulang wrote:
> From: Lang Xu <xulang@uniontech.com>
> 
>> Please create a selftest for this.
> 
> Going to do that. To stably reproduce this bug, I need the KASAN
> config enabled, how do I ensure it's enabled during a selftest cycle,
> by adding the line below to the 'config'? not quite sure.
> 
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ CONFIG_IPV6_GRE=y
>   CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_BPF=y
>   CONFIG_IPV6_SIT=y
>   CONFIG_IPV6_TUNNEL=y
> +CONFIG_KASAN=y

I would leave out this config change from this fix for now. cc: Ihor to 
consider enabling it for bpf-next.

It is still useful to have a selftest for this case. I always have KASAN 
turned on when running selftests.


>> This is fixing the src side of the "copy_map_value_long(map, dst, src)".
>> The src could also be from a skb? What is the value_size that the
>> verifier is checking for bpf_map_update_elem?
> 
> The value_size checked by verifier is exactly the size with which
> the map is defined, i.e., not the size rounded up to 8-byte by kernel

If the verifier ensures only 4-bytes, I am not sure if the helper should 
read 8-bytes.

> 
> As for bpf_map_update_elem->..->copy_map_value_long, 'src' couldn't be from
> 'skb' which mismatches the expected ptr-type of 'bpf_map_update_elem',
> I've tried codes like these:
> 
> 1. bpf_map_update_elem(&lru_map, &key, skb, BPF_ANY);
> 2. bpf_map_update_elem(&lru_map, &key, skb->sk, BPF_ANY);  // null checked
> 3. bpf_map_update_elem(&lru_map, &key, skb->flow_keys, BPF_ANY);
> 
> All these ptrs mismatch the expected ptr-type, which can be detected by the verifier.
> The verifier complains with msg like 'R3 type=ctx expected=fp, pkt, pkt_meta, map_key,
> map_value, mem, ringbuf_mem, buf, trusted_ptr'

I meant the __sk_buff->data. Take a look at how skb->data can be used in 
the selftests. __sk_buff->data may not have readable bytes rounded up to 
8. Just one example that the src cannot always be fixed by allocating more.

 From looking at git history on pcpu_init_value, the issue should be 
introduced in commit d3bec0138bfb.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-16 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-12  5:25 [PATCH bpf v1] bpf: Fix OOB in bpf_obj_memcpy for cgroup storage xulang
2026-03-12 11:51 ` Paul Chaignon
2026-03-12 16:41   ` Yonghong Song
2026-03-12 18:02     ` Paul Chaignon
2026-03-12 19:58       ` Yonghong Song
2026-03-12 16:46 ` Yonghong Song
2026-03-13 20:34 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-16 13:51   ` xulang
2026-03-16 20:50     ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2026-03-16 21:22       ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-03-17 10:02       ` [PATCH bpf 0/2] bpf: Fix and test cgroup storage OOB issue xulang
     [not found]       ` <20260317100227.2157104-1-xulang@uniontech.com>
2026-03-17 10:02         ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: Fix OOB in bpf_obj_memcpy for cgroup storage xulang
2026-03-25  1:36           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-17 10:02         ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for cgroup storage OOB read xulang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=82ee475b-034a-442c-b290-cc7905a7f33c@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dzm91@hust.edu.cn \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=huyinhao@hust.edu.cn \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kaiyanm@hust.edu.cn \
    --cc=kernel@uniontech.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=xulang@uniontech.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox