From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: xulang <xulang@uniontech.com>
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, dzm91@hust.edu.cn, eddyz87@gmail.com,
haoluo@google.com, huyinhao@hust.edu.cn,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kaiyanm@hust.edu.cn,
kernel@uniontech.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul.chaignon@gmail.com,
sdf@fomichev.me, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v1] bpf: Fix OOB in bpf_obj_memcpy for cgroup storage
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 13:50:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82ee475b-034a-442c-b290-cc7905a7f33c@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D3B60D7890B13875+reply-to-v1-review@uniontech.com>
On 3/16/26 6:51 AM, xulang wrote:
> From: Lang Xu <xulang@uniontech.com>
>
>> Please create a selftest for this.
>
> Going to do that. To stably reproduce this bug, I need the KASAN
> config enabled, how do I ensure it's enabled during a selftest cycle,
> by adding the line below to the 'config'? not quite sure.
>
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ CONFIG_IPV6_GRE=y
> CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_BPF=y
> CONFIG_IPV6_SIT=y
> CONFIG_IPV6_TUNNEL=y
> +CONFIG_KASAN=y
I would leave out this config change from this fix for now. cc: Ihor to
consider enabling it for bpf-next.
It is still useful to have a selftest for this case. I always have KASAN
turned on when running selftests.
>> This is fixing the src side of the "copy_map_value_long(map, dst, src)".
>> The src could also be from a skb? What is the value_size that the
>> verifier is checking for bpf_map_update_elem?
>
> The value_size checked by verifier is exactly the size with which
> the map is defined, i.e., not the size rounded up to 8-byte by kernel
If the verifier ensures only 4-bytes, I am not sure if the helper should
read 8-bytes.
>
> As for bpf_map_update_elem->..->copy_map_value_long, 'src' couldn't be from
> 'skb' which mismatches the expected ptr-type of 'bpf_map_update_elem',
> I've tried codes like these:
>
> 1. bpf_map_update_elem(&lru_map, &key, skb, BPF_ANY);
> 2. bpf_map_update_elem(&lru_map, &key, skb->sk, BPF_ANY); // null checked
> 3. bpf_map_update_elem(&lru_map, &key, skb->flow_keys, BPF_ANY);
>
> All these ptrs mismatch the expected ptr-type, which can be detected by the verifier.
> The verifier complains with msg like 'R3 type=ctx expected=fp, pkt, pkt_meta, map_key,
> map_value, mem, ringbuf_mem, buf, trusted_ptr'
I meant the __sk_buff->data. Take a look at how skb->data can be used in
the selftests. __sk_buff->data may not have readable bytes rounded up to
8. Just one example that the src cannot always be fixed by allocating more.
From looking at git history on pcpu_init_value, the issue should be
introduced in commit d3bec0138bfb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-12 5:25 [PATCH bpf v1] bpf: Fix OOB in bpf_obj_memcpy for cgroup storage xulang
2026-03-12 11:51 ` Paul Chaignon
2026-03-12 16:41 ` Yonghong Song
2026-03-12 18:02 ` Paul Chaignon
2026-03-12 19:58 ` Yonghong Song
2026-03-12 16:46 ` Yonghong Song
2026-03-13 20:34 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-16 13:51 ` xulang
2026-03-16 20:50 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2026-03-16 21:22 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-03-17 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf 0/2] bpf: Fix and test cgroup storage OOB issue xulang
[not found] ` <20260317100227.2157104-1-xulang@uniontech.com>
2026-03-17 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: Fix OOB in bpf_obj_memcpy for cgroup storage xulang
2026-03-25 1:36 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-17 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for cgroup storage OOB read xulang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82ee475b-034a-442c-b290-cc7905a7f33c@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dzm91@hust.edu.cn \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=huyinhao@hust.edu.cn \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kaiyanm@hust.edu.cn \
--cc=kernel@uniontech.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xulang@uniontech.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox