Re: block: Fix use-after-free in blkdev_get()

Markus Elfring
2020-06-05T13:02:20Z

>> The details can vary also for my suggestions.
>> Would you point any more disagreements out on concrete items?
>
> That's exactly the problem with many of your comments.
> They're vague to the point of unintelligibility.

Was is so vague about possibilities which I point out for patch reviews
(for example)?
* Spelling corrections
* Additional wording alternatives

>>> But refcount -> reference count is not particularly interesting.
>>
>> Can a wording clarification become helpful also for this issue?
>
> This is a great example. I have no idea what this sentence means.

Some developers usually prefer to use abbreviations at specific places
while I dare to propose the usage of another well-known term
for commit messages.

Regards,
Markus