Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] arm64: Add architecture support for PCI

Catalin Marinas
2014-03-19T13:56:50Z

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 06:05:25PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:38:21PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:38:08PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Friday 14 March 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > > +int pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t address, resource_size_t size)
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > > +unsigned long pci_address_to_pio(phys_addr_t address)
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > > +void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > > > > [ actually most of this file ]
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe it was raised before already but can we have __weak generic
> > > > > definitions of these functions? They don't seem to be arm64 specific in
> > > > > any way.
> > [...]
> > > Catalin, if you are happy to ask for ACKs from all arch maintainers that might get
> > > affected by our custom version of pci_address_to_pio() before you can pull PCI support
> > > for arm64 then I can propose a new patchset.
> >
> > You don't need to change the other architectures, that's the point of a
> > __weak definition, it will be automatically overridden. If you want, you
> > can even place a GENERIC_PCI or whatever config option that is only
> > selected by arm64 for the time being.
>
> pci_address_to_pio() is alread __weak. My patch was adding the arm64 version of it. Adding
> an #ifdef GENERIC_PCI to the __weak implementation is not just a temporary solution.

Ah, I start to understand what you mean, pci_address_to_pio() is already
defined as __weak in drivers/of/address.c. So the reason we redefine it
on arm64 is that it uses the io_list resources which are populated by
pci_register_io_range(). Do you see any other architecture using a
similar logic (that could be shared)?

Any other functions in this file that could be shared (and are not
__weak already)?

--
Catalin