From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262025AbVCNWTA (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:19:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262027AbVCNWKO (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:10:14 -0500 Received: from fmmailgate05.web.de ([217.72.192.243]:19346 "EHLO fmmailgate05.web.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261967AbVCNWFu (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:05:50 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:05:40 +0100 Message-Id: <833993817@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Enrico Bartky" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: SMbus not enabled Organization: http://freemail.web.de/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, my notebook have a SiS 964 Chipset and "quirked" by "quirk_sis_503", ... but there is no SMbus device. If I add a call to the "quirk_sis_96x_smbus" function directly from the "quirk_sis_503" function, the smbus is present, but I think a call to a quirk from a quirk is not optimal. Is there a better solution? EnricoB __________________________________________________________ Mit WEB.DE FreePhone mit hoechster Qualitaet ab 0 Ct./Min. weltweit telefonieren! http://freephone.web.de/?mc=021201