From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
To: Manikanta Maddireddy <mmaddireddy@nvidia.com>,
bhelgaas@google.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
kwilczynski@kernel.org, mani@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
thierry.reding@gmail.com, kishon@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Frank.Li@nxp.com, den@valinux.co.jp,
hongxing.zhu@nxp.com, jingoohan1@gmail.com, vidyas@nvidia.com,
cassel@kernel.org, 18255117159@163.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: dwc: Apply ECRC workaround for DesignWare cores prior to 5.10A
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 09:52:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <835e33b9-e5ad-470f-b21a-cc9a11362ed0@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260410062507.657453-1-mmaddireddy@nvidia.com>
On 10/04/2026 07:25, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
> The ECRC (TLP digest) workaround was originally applied only for DesignWare
> core version 4.90a. Per discussion in Synopsys case, the dependency of the
> iATU TD bit on ECRC generation was removed in 5.10a, so apply the
> workaround for all DWC versions below that release.
>
> Replace the misleading comment that referred to raw version constants
> with readable DesignWare release name aligned with the implementation.
>
> Fixes: b210b1595606 PCI: dwc: Apply ECRC workaround to DesignWare 5.00a as well
> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Maddireddy <mmaddireddy@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> index d69db0ab3b14..d0b3b93fc940 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -487,8 +487,8 @@ static inline void dw_pcie_writel_atu_ob(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg
> static inline u32 dw_pcie_enable_ecrc(u32 val)
> {
> /*
> - * DWC versions 0x3530302a and 0x3536322a has a design issue where the 'TD'
> - * bit in the Control register-1 of the ATU outbound region acts
> + * DesignWare core versions prior to 5.10A have a design issue where the
> + * 'TD' bit in the Control register-1 of the ATU outbound region acts
> * like an override for the ECRC setting, i.e., the presence of TLP
> * Digest (ECRC) in the outgoing TLPs is solely determined by this
> * bit. This is contrary to the PCIe spec which says that the
> @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ int dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci,
> if (upper_32_bits(limit_addr) > upper_32_bits(parent_bus_addr) &&
> dw_pcie_ver_is_ge(pci, 460A))
> val |= PCIE_ATU_INCREASE_REGION_SIZE;
> - if (dw_pcie_ver_is(pci, 490A) || dw_pcie_ver_is(pci, 500A))
> + if (!dw_pcie_ver_is_ge(pci, 510A))
> val = dw_pcie_enable_ecrc(val);
> dw_pcie_writel_atu_ob(pci, atu->index, PCIE_ATU_REGION_CTRL1, val);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> index 82946bf78b21..739a213c27c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> #define DW_PCIE_VER_480A 0x3438302a
> #define DW_PCIE_VER_490A 0x3439302a
> #define DW_PCIE_VER_500A 0x3530302a
> +#define DW_PCIE_VER_510A 0x3531302a
> #define DW_PCIE_VER_520A 0x3532302a
> #define DW_PCIE_VER_540A 0x3534302a
> #define DW_PCIE_VER_562A 0x3536322a
Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Thanks!
Jon
--
nvpublic
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-10 6:25 [PATCH 1/1] PCI: dwc: Apply ECRC workaround for DesignWare cores prior to 5.10A Manikanta Maddireddy
2026-05-05 8:52 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=835e33b9-e5ad-470f-b21a-cc9a11362ed0@nvidia.com \
--to=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=mmaddireddy@nvidia.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox