public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>,
	Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched/cputime: code cleanup in irqtime_account_process_tick
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 21:30:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <835fd412-544a-1bdd-e75f-f557e299a50a@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200107091315.GS2844@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>


>> I fear we can't really play the exact same game as account_process_tick() here.
>> Since this is irqtime precise accounting, we have already computed the
>> irqtime delta in account_other_time() (or we will at some point in the future)
>> and substracted it from the ticks to account. This means that the remaining cputime
>> to account has to be either utime/stime/gtime/idle-time but not interrupt time, or
>> we may account interrupt time twice. And account_system_time() tries to account
>> irq time, for example if we interrupt a softirq.
> 
> OK, I've dropped 2 and 3. Thanks Frederic!
> 

Hi Frederic & Peter,

Thanks a lot for the comments and review! 
It's my fault to mess up the account_system_time details. And seems there is no easy way to replace irqtime_account_process_tick or account_process_tick with each other.

but on the other side, the account_idle_ticks could be replaced by irqtime_account_process_tick, or at least to remove irqtime_account_idle_ticks function. Any comments?

Thanks
Alex

---

From 7073e60babc3b42a987b4e89f380956887734233 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 20:32:55 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] sched/cputime: remove irqtime_account_idle_ticks

irqtime_account_idle_ticks and irqtime_account_process_tick use in same
condition. We don't bother to name and use a irqtime_account_idle_ticks
for only one calling. Remove the function to simply code and reduce a
bit object size of kernel.

And further more, we could replace account_idle_ticks by
irqtime_account_process_tick too. But feed and check 'current' looks weird.
So this is ok.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> 
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 
---
 kernel/sched/cputime.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index cff3e656566d..17640d145e44 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -390,12 +390,7 @@ static void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
 	}
 }
 
-static void irqtime_account_idle_ticks(int ticks)
-{
-	irqtime_account_process_tick(current, 0, ticks);
-}
 #else /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
-static inline void irqtime_account_idle_ticks(int ticks) { }
 static inline void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
 						int nr_ticks) { }
 #endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
@@ -505,7 +500,7 @@ void account_idle_ticks(unsigned long ticks)
 	u64 cputime, steal;
 
 	if (sched_clock_irqtime) {
-		irqtime_account_idle_ticks(ticks);
+		irqtime_account_process_tick(current, 0, ticks);
 		return;
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.3.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-09 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-02 10:07 [PATCH 1/3] sched/cputime: move rq parameter in irqtime_account_process_tick Alex Shi
2020-01-02 10:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched/cputime: code cleanup " Alex Shi
2020-01-06 15:53   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-01-07  9:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-09 13:30       ` Alex Shi [this message]
2020-01-02 10:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched/cputime: cleanup account_process_tick/account_idle_ticks Alex Shi
2020-01-06 14:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/cputime: move rq parameter in irqtime_account_process_tick Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-17 10:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Alex Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=835fd412-544a-1bdd-e75f-f557e299a50a@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox