From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
To: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Cc: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: ralink: Fix refcount leak in ill_acc_of_setup()
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 16:16:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83B958C5-1C7B-43C4-9EA2-93F8705B31A8@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOiHx==cJicn3fYbf+yOfGX1ORZNgBwUNuV-2CNAxmdpn9O5Ww@mail.gmail.com>
On 9. Apr 2025, at 14:57, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 10:32 AM Thorsten Blum wrote:
>>
>> The of_find_device_by_node() function increments the reference count of
>> the embedded device, which should be released with put_device() when it
>> is no longer needed.
>>
>> In ill_acc_of_setup(), put_device() is only called on error paths, but
>> not on the success path. Fix this by calling put_device() before
>> returning successfully.
>
> I would think this is very much deliberate as the device is used as
> the priv argument of the registered IRQ handler. AFAIU as long as that
> one is live the reference of the device needs to be kept.
>
> Dropping the reference of the device should only be done after
> freeing/unregistering the IRQ again, which currently never happens.
Thanks for the explanation. I assumed request_irq() would increment the
refcount, but that's apparently not the case because it's just a cookie.
Thanks,
Thorsten
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-07 8:27 [PATCH] MIPS: ralink: Fix refcount leak in ill_acc_of_setup() Thorsten Blum
2025-04-09 12:57 ` Jonas Gorski
2025-04-09 14:16 ` Thorsten Blum [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83B958C5-1C7B-43C4-9EA2-93F8705B31A8@linux.dev \
--to=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=jonas.gorski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox