From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
To: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/bo: mark expected switch fall-through
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:02:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83ed0bf4-9833-8bf2-41ff-638035e71bd3@embeddedor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190211185835.GA19174@embeddedor>
Hi,
Please drop this, as I have included this fix into
the following patch, which addresses all the
expected fall-throughs in drivers/gpu/drm:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1042856/
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 2/11/19 12:58 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warning:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c: In function ‘nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c:1434:53: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> if (drm->client.mem->oclass < NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50 || !mem->kind)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c:1438:2: note: here
> case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> ^~~~
>
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> index 73eff52036d2..a72be71c45b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> @@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
> if (drm->client.mem->oclass < NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50 || !mem->kind)
> /* untiled */
> break;
> - /* fallthrough, tiled memory */
> + /* fall through - tiled memory */
> case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> reg->bus.offset = reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT;
> reg->bus.base = device->func->resource_addr(device, 1);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-15 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-11 18:58 [PATCH] drm/nouveau/bo: mark expected switch fall-through Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-02-15 16:02 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
2019-02-15 17:30 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83ed0bf4-9833-8bf2-41ff-638035e71bd3@embeddedor.com \
--to=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox