Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] crypto: ccp: Rename macro for security attributes

[Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>]

On 4/28/23 13:55, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> The attribute_show() macro is only valid for determining the availability
> of security related sysfs entries. Rename the macro to better show this
> relationship.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>

Acked-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

> ---
>   drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c
> index aa15bc4cac2b..85e3dc8853e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct sp_pci {
>   };
>   static struct sp_device *sp_dev_master;
>   
> -#define attribute_show(name, def)						\
> +#define security_attribute_show(name, def)					\
>   static ssize_t name##_show(struct device *d, struct device_attribute *attr,	\
>   			   char *buf)						\
>   {										\
> @@ -42,24 +42,24 @@ static ssize_t name##_show(struct device *d, struct device_attribute *attr,	\
>   	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", (psp->capability & bit) > 0);		\
>   }
>   
> -attribute_show(fused_part, FUSED_PART)
> +security_attribute_show(fused_part, FUSED_PART)
>   static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(fused_part);
> -attribute_show(debug_lock_on, DEBUG_LOCK_ON)
> +security_attribute_show(debug_lock_on, DEBUG_LOCK_ON)
>   static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(debug_lock_on);
> -attribute_show(tsme_status, TSME_STATUS)
> +security_attribute_show(tsme_status, TSME_STATUS)
>   static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(tsme_status);
> -attribute_show(anti_rollback_status, ANTI_ROLLBACK_STATUS)
> +security_attribute_show(anti_rollback_status, ANTI_ROLLBACK_STATUS)
>   static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(anti_rollback_status);
> -attribute_show(rpmc_production_enabled, RPMC_PRODUCTION_ENABLED)
> +security_attribute_show(rpmc_production_enabled, RPMC_PRODUCTION_ENABLED)
>   static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(rpmc_production_enabled);
> -attribute_show(rpmc_spirom_available, RPMC_SPIROM_AVAILABLE)
> +security_attribute_show(rpmc_spirom_available, RPMC_SPIROM_AVAILABLE)
>   static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(rpmc_spirom_available);
> -attribute_show(hsp_tpm_available, HSP_TPM_AVAILABLE)
> +security_attribute_show(hsp_tpm_available, HSP_TPM_AVAILABLE)
>   static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(hsp_tpm_available);
> -attribute_show(rom_armor_enforced, ROM_ARMOR_ENFORCED)
> +security_attribute_show(rom_armor_enforced, ROM_ARMOR_ENFORCED)
>   static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(rom_armor_enforced);
>   
> -static struct attribute *psp_attrs[] = {
> +static struct attribute *psp_security_attrs[] = {
>   	&dev_attr_fused_part.attr,
>   	&dev_attr_debug_lock_on.attr,
>   	&dev_attr_tsme_status.attr,
> @@ -83,13 +83,13 @@ static umode_t psp_security_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *a
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -static struct attribute_group psp_attr_group = {
> -	.attrs = psp_attrs,
> +static struct attribute_group psp_security_attr_group = {
> +	.attrs = psp_security_attrs,
>   	.is_visible = psp_security_is_visible,
>   };
>   
>   static const struct attribute_group *psp_groups[] = {
> -	&psp_attr_group,
> +	&psp_security_attr_group,
>   	NULL,
>   };
>