From: "tomorrow Wang (王德明)" <wangdeming@inspur.com>
To: "mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: 答复: [PATCH] virtio_ring: remove unnecessary to_vvq call in virtqueue_disable_cb_packed
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:21:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83fd2deadce046c69d4e3acb40b5e284@inspur.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220622081411-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1775 bytes --]
Hi,
The 35c51e093d956f6d058e193711c8d424817a44a9 patch has maked a similar
change
> Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: remove unnecessary to_vvq call in
> virtqueue_disable_cb_packed
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 03:50:52AM -0400, Deming Wang wrote:
> > It passes '_vq' to virtqueue_use_indirect(), which still calls to_vvq
> > to get 'vq', let's directly pass 'vq'. It can avoid unnecessary call
> > of to_vvq in hot path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com>
>
> I do not see the point of any of these patches. Sorry.
> If this is supposed to be an optimization, post some numbers pls.
>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 6 ++----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c index 13a7348cedff..af2b7785ed77 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > @@ -1475,10 +1475,8 @@ static void
> *virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -static void virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > +static void virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq)
> > {
> > - struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> > -
> > if (vq->packed.event_flags_shadow !=
> VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE) {
> > vq->packed.event_flags_shadow =
> VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE;
> > vq->packed.vring.driver->flags =
> > @@ -2007,7 +2005,7 @@ void virtqueue_disable_cb(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > return;
> >
> > if (vq->packed_ring)
> > - virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(_vq);
> > + virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(vq);
> > else
> > virtqueue_disable_cb_split(_vq);
> > }
> > --
> > 2.27.0
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 3780 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-23 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-22 7:50 [PATCH] virtio_ring: remove unnecessary to_vvq call in virtqueue_disable_cb_packed Deming Wang
2022-06-22 12:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-06-23 0:21 ` tomorrow Wang (王德明) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83fd2deadce046c69d4e3acb40b5e284@inspur.com \
--to=wangdeming@inspur.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox