Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status

Christian Trefzer
2005-06-26T00:46:27Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1160 bytes --]

Hubert Chan schrieb:
> How about something of the form "nikita-955(file:line)"? Or the
> reverse: "file:line(nikita-955)". Would that keep everyone happy?
>
Damn, I was wondering how long it would take until someone would come up
with a compromise solution ; ) Compromises everywhere will lead to
nowhere, I've learned that the hard way. But this is really not a major
issue, so let's not make a showstopper out of this one and the likes.

For what I know about the whole inclusion discussion until now, there's
been a whole lot of flamewar chickenshit so far. Considering that I have
no FS developing abilities whatsoever, I'm pretty pissed at people who
do know better in their field and should know better than waste their
time on discussions other than constructive ones.

Get the personal bullshit out of the way, everyone, please! Get in touch
and work out your differences in a productive manner. If every
interesting yet at first intrusive extension to the kernel causes as
much kindergarten as this one, where will we end up? Stagnation sucks,
yet good progress is sometimes slow-paced...

Peace, everyone!
Chris
(hardcore, not hippie)

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 894 bytes --]