From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262445AbVF2GSM (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 02:18:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262446AbVF2GSM (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 02:18:12 -0400 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.194]:39333 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262445AbVF2GSI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 02:18:08 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FXVqI7BIVnqJhAUE6ZhPCwNS9x68CvScx6XIvULLZCt8L6W1zRNCRbNar3rFx1Bb68Gtwtk/yzq++cQbJE+al8mtcn32zqN3zZXyVMwHg6b1g3hippxRewFp6CWwg6DRWtB9oRPmAOObLDPQW9+EHIKlgnymzGk56BwvszHiwP0= Message-ID: <84144f02050628231814e9e6db@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 09:18:07 +0300 From: Pekka Enberg Reply-To: Pekka Enberg To: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: reiser4 merging action list Cc: Andrew Morton , tytso@mit.edu, mjt@nysv.org, vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl, ninja@slaphack.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, jgarzik@pobox.com, hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, lord@xfs.org, vs , Pekka Enberg In-Reply-To: <42C2348F.3000908@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <42BB7B32.4010100@slaphack.com> <200506240334.j5O3YowB008100@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <20050627092138.GD11013@nysv.org> <20050627124255.GB6280@thunk.org> <42C0578F.7030608@namesys.com> <20050627212628.GB27805@thunk.org> <42C084F1.70607@namesys.com> <20050627162303.156551b4.akpm@osdl.org> <42C2348F.3000908@namesys.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > > There's also the custom list, hash and debug code. We should either > > > > a) remove them or > > > > b) generify them and submit as standalone works or > > > > c) justify them as custom-to-reiser4 and leave them as-is. On 6/29/05, Hans Reiser wrote: > either b) or c) is ok with me for the list code. The debug code should > be c) I think. > > Probably vs can offer a more detailed and accurate opinion, I completely agree that the current state of the generic hashing facilities is somewhat poor but I fail to see why you can't use . As for the debugging code, I would love to see that turned into something generic (every subsystem has their own now) but it is definitely not something that should stop you from merging. Pekka