Re: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12

Matthew Garrett
2005-07-07T12:53:22Z

Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 22:04, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Do you implement the entire swsusp userspace interface? If not, removing
>> it probably isn't a reasonable plan without fair warning.
>
> I'm not suggesting removing the sysfs interface or replacing system to
> ram - just the suspend to disk part.

Right, so you support the resume from disk trigger in sysfs and the
/proc/acpi/sleep interface? If suspend2 is a complete dropin replacement
then I'm much happier with the idea of dropping swsusp, but I don't want
to have to tie suspend/resume scripts to kernel versions.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.linux-rutgers.kernel@srcf.ucam.org