From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752946AbZE3HMr (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 May 2009 03:12:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751181AbZE3HMi (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 May 2009 03:12:38 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f168.google.com ([209.85.220.168]:34472 "EHLO mail-fx0-f168.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751167AbZE3HMi convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 May 2009 03:12:38 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=hJrkl6Jy3Q1fHdxlPQw2g4UoYQRIQu7N/KfLQ19pbfIe9Mg2OAFPKLE22cyu9OjDEM fvOIbApUxToLb+0tOuvlKKpgiNjHpY+TXMtxytPWDgnxCtFKC5oDXYs1y4UstZHXXsW1 j3Q6T8vDqLEF7L9DYVWSXJlPvGu3JECQLnTnY= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090529155859.2cf20823.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20090520183045.GB10547@oblivion.subreption.com> <1242852158.6582.231.camel@laptop> <20090520212413.GF10756@oblivion.subreption.com> <20090529155859.2cf20823.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 10:12:38 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3da1dc2b9edf9be3 Message-ID: <84144f020905300012h6ca92605ve8fdcbaba39ac054@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] Support for sanitization flag in low-level page allocator From: Pekka Enberg To: Andrew Morton Cc: "Larry H." , peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mingo@redhat.com, pageexec@freemail.hu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrew, On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 1:58 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: >  But how to do that?  Particular callsites don't get to alter >  kfree()'s behaviour.  So they'd need to use a new kfree_sensitive(). >  Which is just syntactic sugar around the code whihc we presently >  implement. Unless I am missing something here, we already have kfree_sensitive(), we just call it kzfree(). Pekka