Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/xe: Wire up dmem cgroup reclaim for VRAM manager

[Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>]

Den 2026-04-28 kl. 09:31, skrev Thomas Hellström:
> Register the VRAM manager with the dmem cgroup reclaim infrastructure
> so that lowering dmem.max below current VRAM usage triggers TTM
> eviction rather than failing with -EBUSY.
> 
> Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot:claude-sonnet-4.6
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
> index 5fd0d5506a7e..1bdcb3fee901 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
> @@ -303,13 +303,6 @@ int __xe_ttm_vram_mgr_init(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_ttm_vram_mgr *mgr,
>  	struct ttm_resource_manager *man = &mgr->manager;
>  	int err;
>  
> -	if (mem_type != XE_PL_STOLEN) {
> -		const char *name = mem_type == XE_PL_VRAM0 ? "vram0" : "vram1";
> -		man->cg = drmm_cgroup_register_region(&xe->drm, name, size);
> -		if (IS_ERR(man->cg))
> -			return PTR_ERR(man->cg);
> -	}
> -
>  	man->func = &xe_ttm_vram_mgr_func;
>  	mgr->mem_type = mem_type;
>  	mutex_init(&mgr->lock);
> @@ -318,6 +311,18 @@ int __xe_ttm_vram_mgr_init(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_ttm_vram_mgr *mgr,
>  	mgr->visible_avail = io_size;
>  
>  	ttm_resource_manager_init(man, &xe->ttm, size);
> +
> +	if (mem_type != XE_PL_STOLEN) {
> +		const char *name = mem_type == XE_PL_VRAM0 ? "vram0" : "vram1";
> +		struct dmem_cgroup_region *cg =
> +			drmm_cgroup_register_region(&xe->drm, name, size);
> +
> +		if (IS_ERR(cg))
> +			return PTR_ERR(cg);
> +
> +		ttm_resource_manager_set_dmem_region(man, cg);
> +	}
> +
>  	err = gpu_buddy_init(&mgr->mm, man->size, default_page_size);
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;

This patch will conflict with 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/164694/ which removes
stolen support, can we merge that patch first while we wait for AMD acks?

Do I need an ack to get the series through drm-misc?

Kind regards,
~Maarten Lankhorst