From: "M K, Muralidhara" <muralimk@amd.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Muralidhara M K" <muralidhara.mk@amd.com>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Serialize the data plane against socket teardown
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 11:03:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <844fc5bb-5e0b-4380-b73d-56ff235fea28@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0ff9acc-5a29-1556-dc35-3df205bcf9ec@linux.intel.com>
On 7/8/2026 3:37 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2026, Muralidhara M K wrote:
>
>> This series makes the AMD HSMP driver safe against concurrent probe/remove
>> of its per-socket devices and against the lock-free data plane (open
>> /dev/hsmp fds and hwmon/sysfs reads) racing socket teardown.
>>
>> The ACPI front-end binds one platform device per socket but shares a single
>> socket array and a single /dev/hsmp misc device across them, while the data
>> plane issues mailbox messages with no coordination with driver teardown.
>> misc_deregister() does not drain already-open fds, so an in-flight message
>> can touch a freed socket array or an unmapped mailbox on unbind.
>>
>> The fix is built up in small, bisectable steps:
>>
>> 1. Serialize the ACPI probe/remove handshake with a dedicated mutex.
>> 2. Map the metric table with ioremap() and release it via a devres action,
>> so its lifetime is no longer pinned to a single per-socket devres scope.
>> 3. Serialize the per-socket metric-table fill-and-copy with a mutex.
>> 4. Clear mdev.this_device on deregister (independent hygiene fix that the
>> next patch relies on to track /dev/hsmp registration).
>> 5. Track shared socket ownership with a refcount and a single coordinated
>> release helper, drop the is_probed flag and unparent /dev/hsmp.
>> 6. Add hsmp_sock_rwsem: the data plane holds it for read, a teardown path
>> holds it for write to drain in-flight messages before freeing the socket
>> array or unmapping the mailbox.
>>
>> Each patch builds on its own and the series is checkpatch --strict clean.
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>> - Use guard()/scoped locking consistently for both the probe mutex and the
>> data-plane rwsem, from the first patch that introduces each lock.
>> - Platform teardown now uses devm_add_action_or_reset(): the metric-table
>> unmap and the per-socket mutex destroy run from a single devres action
>> instead of explicit remove()/probe-failure code. The ACPI array is shared
>> across per-socket devices and must outlive an individual unbind, so it
>> stays on explicit teardown.
>> - Split the mdev.this_device clear into its own patch (new patch 4).
>> - Drop dead defensive checks: the !sock guard in hsmp_unmap_metric_tbls()
>> and the if (sock) in hsmp_acpi_remove(). Keep and document the one in the
>> probe-failure path, where sock can legitimately be NULL.
>> - Replace the !--refs construct with a plain decrement-then-test.
>> - Explain why the probe path uses a separate mutex rather than the rwsem
>> write side: the probe path itself drives the data plane via hsmp_test(),
>> which takes the rwsem for read, so holding it for write across probe
>> would deadlock.
>
> Hi,
>
> Could we have xx_locked() variant function for hsmp_test() to use so the
> recursive locking problem is avoided?
>
Yes, that works and let me drop hsmp_acpi_probe_mutex entirely and
serialize the ACPI control plane on hsmp_sock_rwsem alone.
One clarification I am thinking of is: the recursion isn't only through
hsmp_test(). init_acpi()/init_platform_device() also reach the data
plane via hsmp_cache_proto_ver(), hsmp_get_tbl_dram_base() and the hwmon
setup, all through hsmp_send_message(). So rather than a one-off
hsmp_test_locked(), I'll split hsmp_send_message() into a
hsmp_send_message_locked() core (bounds/nospec/dev check + per-socket
semaphore + MMIO, no rwsem) and a thin hsmp_send_message() wrapper that
takes the rwsem for read. The probe-only senders call the _locked core,
the probe path takes the rwsem for write, and hsmp_acpi_probe_mutex goes
away.
The one behavioral change is the probe then holds the rwsem for write
across the whole mailbox handshake (a few messages, up to
HSMP_MSG_TIMEOUT each), so the data plane on already-probed sockets is
blocked for that window. Probe is a boot/rare-rebind event so I think
that's fine. I'll add lockdep_assert_held_write() in the locked core to
keep the "rwsem already held" contract explicit.
or Let me know your inputs ?
>> - Comment cleanups: drop history and "patch N" references, drop
>> parenthetical function asides, single space after periods.
>>
>> Muralidhara M K (6):
>> platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Serialize ACPI HSMP is_probed with a probe
>> mutex
>> platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Map the metric table with ioremap() and unmap
>> it explicitly
>> platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Serialize per-socket metric table reads with a
>> mutex
>> platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Clear mdev.this_device on deregister
>> platform/x86/amd/hsmp: ACPI HSMP refcounted sockets and coordinated
>> release
>> platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Serialize the data plane against socket
>> teardown
>>
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/acpi.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/hsmp.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/hsmp.h | 15 ++-
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/plat.c | 26 ++++++
>> 4 files changed, 265 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> base-commit: ff7836fa850c2f815bc219f1e48f6ec8699f4ae7
>>
>
> --
> i.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 4:23 [PATCH v4 0/6] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Serialize the data plane against socket teardown Muralidhara M K
2026-07-08 4:24 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Serialize ACPI HSMP is_probed with a probe mutex Muralidhara M K
2026-07-08 4:24 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Map the metric table with ioremap() and unmap it explicitly Muralidhara M K
2026-07-08 10:17 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-07-09 5:40 ` M K, Muralidhara
2026-07-08 4:24 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Serialize per-socket metric table reads with a mutex Muralidhara M K
2026-07-08 4:24 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Clear mdev.this_device on deregister Muralidhara M K
2026-07-08 4:24 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: ACPI HSMP refcounted sockets and coordinated release Muralidhara M K
2026-07-08 4:24 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Serialize the data plane against socket teardown Muralidhara M K
2026-07-08 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] " Ilpo Järvinen
2026-07-09 5:33 ` M K, Muralidhara [this message]
2026-07-09 9:15 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=844fc5bb-5e0b-4380-b73d-56ff235fea28@amd.com \
--to=muralimk@amd.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muralidhara.mk@amd.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox