From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 May 2001 11:22:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 May 2001 11:22:22 -0400 Received: from ppp0.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.3]:57361 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 29 May 2001 11:22:06 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: Nico Schottelius cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: unresolved symbols printk ? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 29 May 2001 15:54:36 +0200." <3B13AA1C.AF1F86F9@pcsystems.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 00:55:11 +1000 Message-ID: <8463.991148111@ocs3.ocs-net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 29 May 2001 15:54:36 +0200, Nico Schottelius wrote: >Just a small question, what could be the reason I have a broken >Makefile ? >This seems to happen frequently, if there is a need >to name it into the lkml. I am surprised >a makefile gets screwed up ? It is the makefile design for modversions that is broken. The entire makefile system is being redesigned and rewritten from scratch for kernel 2.5.