From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
<nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 6/7] page_pool: check for DMA sync shortcut earlier
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 11:40:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84711866-7607-4513-bfb3-ff5aa155dc5a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac0a09f2-5f05-4317-a1cf-b7135791c639@arm.com>
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 16:49:48 +0100
> On 24/04/2024 9:52 am, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
>> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:58:31 +0200
>>
>>> We can save a couple more function calls in the Page Pool code if we
>>> check for dma_need_sync() earlier, just when we test pp->p.dma_sync.
>>> Move both these checks into an inline wrapper and call the PP wrapper
>>> over the generic DMA sync function only when both are true.
>>> You can't cache the result of dma_need_sync() in &page_pool, as it may
>>> change anytime if an SWIOTLB buffer is allocated or mapped.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> net/core/page_pool.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
>>> index 6cf26a68fa91..87319c6365e0 100644
>>> --- a/net/core/page_pool.c
>>> +++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
>>> @@ -398,16 +398,24 @@ static struct page
>>> *__page_pool_get_cached(struct page_pool *pool)
>>> return page;
>>> }
>>> -static void page_pool_dma_sync_for_device(const struct page_pool
>>> *pool,
>>> - const struct page *page,
>>> - unsigned int dma_sync_size)
>>> +static void __page_pool_dma_sync_for_device(const struct page_pool
>>> *pool,
>>> + const struct page *page,
>>> + u32 dma_sync_size)
>>> {
>>> dma_addr_t dma_addr = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page);
>>> dma_sync_size = min(dma_sync_size, pool->p.max_len);
>>> - dma_sync_single_range_for_device(pool->p.dev, dma_addr,
>>> - pool->p.offset, dma_sync_size,
>>> - pool->p.dma_dir);
>>> + __dma_sync_single_for_device(pool->p.dev, dma_addr +
>>> pool->p.offset,
>>> + dma_sync_size, pool->p.dma_dir);
>>
>> Breh, this breaks builds on !DMA_NEED_SYNC systems, as this function
>> isn't defined there, and my CI didn't catch it in time... I'll ifdef
>> this in the next spin after some reviews for this one.
>
> Hmm, the way things have ended up, do we even need this change? (Other
> than factoring out the pool->dma_sync check, which is clearly nice)
>
> Since __page_pool_dma_sync_for_device() is never called directly, the
> flow we always get is:
>
> page_pool_dma_sync_for_device()
> dma_dev_need_sync()
> __page_pool_dma_sync_for_device()
> ... // a handful of trivial arithmetic
> __dma_sync_single_for_device()
>
> i.e. still effectively the same order of
> "if (dma_dev_need_sync()) __dma_sync()" invocations as if we'd just used
> the standard dma_sync(), so referencing the unwrapped internals only
> spreads it out a bit more for no real benefit. As an experiment I tried
> the diff below on top, effectively undoing this problematic part, and it
> doesn't seem to make any appreciable difference in a before-and-after
> comparison of the object code, at least for my arm64 build.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin.
>
> ----->8-----
> diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
> index 27f3b6db800e..b8ab7d4ca229 100644
> --- a/net/core/page_pool.c
> +++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
> @@ -398,24 +398,20 @@ static struct page *__page_pool_get_cached(struct
> page_pool *pool)
> return page;
> }
>
> -static void __page_pool_dma_sync_for_device(const struct page_pool *pool,
> - const struct page *page,
> - u32 dma_sync_size)
> -{
> - dma_addr_t dma_addr = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page);
> -
> - dma_sync_size = min(dma_sync_size, pool->p.max_len);
> - __dma_sync_single_for_device(pool->p.dev, dma_addr + pool->p.offset,
> - dma_sync_size, pool->p.dma_dir);
> -}
> -
> static __always_inline void
So this would unconditionally inline the whole sync code into the call
sites, while I wanted to give a chance for the compilers to uninline
__page_pool_dma_sync_for_device().
> page_pool_dma_sync_for_device(const struct page_pool *pool,
> const struct page *page,
> u32 dma_sync_size)
> {
> - if (pool->dma_sync && dma_dev_need_sync(pool->p.dev))
> - __page_pool_dma_sync_for_device(pool, page, dma_sync_size);
> + dma_addr_t dma_addr = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page);
> +
> + if (!pool->dma_sync)
> + return;
> +
> + dma_sync_size = min(dma_sync_size, pool->p.max_len);
> + dma_sync_single_range_for_device(pool->p.dev, dma_addr,
> + pool->p.offset, dma_sync_size,
> + pool->p.dma_dir);
> }
>
> static bool page_pool_dma_map(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page)
Thanks,
Olek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-06 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-23 13:58 [PATCH net-next v4 0/7] dma: skip calling no-op sync ops when possible Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-23 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/7] dma: compile-out DMA sync op calls when not used Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-23 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/7] dma: avoid redundant calls for sync operations Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-23 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/7] iommu/dma: avoid expensive indirect " Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-23 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/7] page_pool: make sure frag API fields don't span between cachelines Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-23 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/7] page_pool: don't use driver-set flags field directly Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-23 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/7] page_pool: check for DMA sync shortcut earlier Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-24 8:52 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-26 5:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-02 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-06 9:38 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-05-06 9:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-02 15:49 ` Robin Murphy
2024-05-06 9:40 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2024-04-23 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 7/7] xsk: use generic DMA sync shortcut instead of a custom one Alexander Lobakin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84711866-7607-4513-bfb3-ff5aa155dc5a@intel.com \
--to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox