From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
"Petr Mladek" <pmladek@suse.com>,
"Sergey Senozhatsky" <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Esben Haabendal" <esben@geanix.com>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
"Rengarajan S" <rengarajan.s@microchip.com>,
"Peter Collingbourne" <pcc@google.com>,
"Serge Semin" <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
"Lino Sanfilippo" <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tty-next v3 5/6] serial: 8250: Switch to nbcon console
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 14:28:35 +0106 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <848qu8nyzo.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxupiKSSpZlyKhz-@smile.fi.intel.com>
On 2024-10-25, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * Only to be used directly by the console write callbacks, which may not
>> + * require the port lock. Use serial8250_clear_IER() instead for all other
>> + * cases.
>> + */
>> +static void __serial8250_clear_IER(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>> {
>> if (up->capabilities & UART_CAP_UUE)
>> serial_out(up, UART_IER, UART_IER_UUE);
>
>> serial_out(up, UART_IER, 0);
>> }
>>
>> +static inline void serial8250_clear_IER(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>> +{
>> + __serial8250_clear_IER(up);
>
> Shouldn't this have a lockdep annotation to differentiate with the
> above?
Yes, but the follow-up patch adds the annotation as a clean "revert
patch". I can add a line about that in the commit message.
>> +static void serial8250_console_byte_write(struct uart_8250_port *up,
>> + struct nbcon_write_context *wctxt)
>> +{
>> + const char *s = READ_ONCE(wctxt->outbuf);
>> + const char *end = s + READ_ONCE(wctxt->len);
>
> Is there any possibility that outbuf value be changed before we get
> the len and at the end we get the wrong pointer?
No. I was concerned about compiler optimization, since @outbuf can
become NULL. However, it can only become NULL if ownership was
transferred, and that is properly checked anyway. I will remove the
READ_ONCE() usage for v4.
>> struct uart_8250_port {
>
>> u16 lsr_save_mask;
>> #define MSR_SAVE_FLAGS UART_MSR_ANY_DELTA
>> unsigned char msr_saved_flags;
>> + struct irq_work modem_status_work;
>> +
>> + bool console_line_ended; /* line fully output */
>>
>> struct uart_8250_dma *dma;
>> const struct uart_8250_ops *ops;
>
> Btw, have you run `pahole` on this? Perhaps there are better places
> for new members?
Indeed there are. Placing it above the MSR_SAVE_FLAGS macro will reduce
an existing 3-byte hole to 2-bytes and avoid creating a new 7-byte
hole.
Thanks.
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-28 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-25 10:57 [PATCH tty-next v3 0/6] convert 8250 to nbcon John Ogness
2024-10-25 10:57 ` [PATCH tty-next v3 1/6] serial: 8250: Adjust the timeout for FIFO mode John Ogness
2024-10-25 13:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-25 13:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-29 16:24 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2024-10-30 6:05 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-10-31 4:44 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-10-31 8:49 ` John Ogness
2024-11-01 1:24 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-11-01 8:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-04 6:44 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-11-04 6:34 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-11-04 14:13 ` John Ogness
2024-12-02 6:12 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-12-02 16:41 ` John Ogness
2024-12-01 0:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-10-25 10:57 ` [PATCH tty-next v3 2/6] serial: 8250: Use high-level write function for FIFO John Ogness
2024-10-25 13:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-05 16:12 ` Petr Mladek
2024-10-25 10:57 ` [PATCH tty-next v3 3/6] serial: 8250: Split out rx stop/start code into helpers John Ogness
2024-10-25 13:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-06 10:54 ` Petr Mladek
2024-10-25 10:57 ` [PATCH tty-next v3 4/6] serial: 8250: Specify console context for rs485_start/stop_tx John Ogness
2024-10-25 14:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-25 14:25 ` John Ogness
2024-10-25 14:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-30 6:13 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-10-31 9:13 ` John Ogness
2024-11-06 15:42 ` Petr Mladek
2024-11-29 17:45 ` John Ogness
2024-10-25 10:57 ` [PATCH tty-next v3 5/6] serial: 8250: Switch to nbcon console John Ogness
2024-10-25 14:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-28 13:22 ` John Ogness [this message]
2024-11-07 9:48 ` Petr Mladek
2024-10-30 6:33 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-10-31 9:25 ` John Ogness
2024-10-25 10:57 ` [PATCH tty-next v3 6/6] serial: 8250: Revert "drop lockdep annotation from serial8250_clear_IER()" John Ogness
2024-10-25 14:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-25 13:58 ` [PATCH tty-next v3 0/6] convert 8250 to nbcon Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=848qu8nyzo.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
--to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=esben@geanix.com \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rengarajan.s@microchip.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).