The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: "Natalie Vock" <natalie.vock@gmx.de>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tursulin@ursulin.net>,
	"Huang Rui" <ray.huang@amd.com>,
	"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] drm/exec: Add helper to bypass IGNORE_DUPLICATES flag
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 10:43:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84fe315a-bbf2-4dc8-bc75-89e5743d0ea8@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703-ttm_2_drm_exec-v1-1-43685ac1286b@gmx.de>

On 7/3/26 18:31, Natalie Vock wrote:
> TTM is about to switch to drm_exec for locking objects
> in the LRU list. When we're done processing the object, we want to
> unlock it only if the caller doesn't already hold that lock. If
> DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES is set on the exec object (which callers may
> require for unrelated reasons), we have no way of knowing whether the
> lock is already held.
> 
> To remedy this, add a separate helper that forcefully bypasses the
> IGNORE_DUPLICATES flag for only a single locking operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Natalie Vock <natalie.vock@gmx.de>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  include/drm/drm_exec.h     |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c
> index 7988f5e7d56a3..91de6b4d29df8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c
> @@ -190,18 +190,9 @@ static int drm_exec_lock_contended(struct drm_exec *exec)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * drm_exec_lock_obj - lock a GEM object for use
> - * @exec: the drm_exec object with the state
> - * @obj: the GEM object to lock
> - *
> - * Lock a GEM object for use and grab a reference to it.
> - *
> - * Returns: -EDEADLK if a contention is detected, -EALREADY when object is
> - * already locked (can be suppressed by setting the DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES
> - * flag), -ENOMEM when memory allocation failed and zero for success.
> - */
> -int drm_exec_lock_obj(struct drm_exec *exec, struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> +static int __drm_exec_lock_obj(struct drm_exec *exec,
> +			       struct drm_gem_object *obj,
> +			       bool always_report_duplicates)

Rename the new parameter to ignore_duplicates.

>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -226,7 +217,7 @@ int drm_exec_lock_obj(struct drm_exec *exec, struct drm_gem_object *obj)
>  		return -EDEADLK;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (unlikely(ret == -EALREADY) &&
> +	if (unlikely(ret == -EALREADY) && !always_report_duplicates &&
>  	    exec->flags & DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES)
>  		return 0;
>  
> @@ -243,8 +234,43 @@ int drm_exec_lock_obj(struct drm_exec *exec, struct drm_gem_object *obj)
>  	dma_resv_unlock(obj->resv);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * drm_exec_lock_obj - lock a GEM object for use
> + * @exec: the drm_exec object with the state
> + * @obj: the GEM object to lock
> + *
> + * Lock a GEM object for use and grab a reference to it.
> + *
> + * Returns: -EDEADLK if a contention is detected, -EALREADY when object is
> + * already locked (can be suppressed by setting the DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES
> + * flag), -ENOMEM when memory allocation failed and zero for success.
> + */
> +int drm_exec_lock_obj(struct drm_exec *exec, struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> +{
> +	return __drm_exec_lock_obj(exec, obj, false);

And then use "exec->flags & DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES" here.

> +}
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_exec_lock_obj);
>  
> +/**
> + * drm_exec_lock_obj_report_dup - lock a GEM object for use, but always report duplicates
> + * @exec: the drm_exec object with the state
> + * @obj: the GEM object to lock
> + *
> + * Like drm_exec_lock_obj, lock a GEM object for use and grab a reference to it.
> + * Unlike drm_exec_lock_obj, DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES is ignored and duplicates are
> + * always reported.
> + *
> + * Returns: -EDEADLK if a contention is detected, -EALREADY when object is
> + * already locked, -ENOMEM when memory allocation failed and zero for success.
> + */
> +int drm_exec_lock_obj_report_dup(struct drm_exec *exec,
> +				 struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> +{
> +	return __drm_exec_lock_obj(exec, obj, false);

BTW That here is buggy, it should have been true.

Apart from that looks good to me,
Christian.

> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_exec_lock_obj_report_dup);
> +
>  /**
>   * drm_exec_unlock_obj - unlock a GEM object in this exec context
>   * @exec: the drm_exec object with the state
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_exec.h b/include/drm/drm_exec.h
> index 8725ba92ff916..ff80dd2b72240 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_exec.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_exec.h
> @@ -176,6 +176,8 @@ void drm_exec_init(struct drm_exec *exec, u32 flags, unsigned nr);
>  void drm_exec_fini(struct drm_exec *exec);
>  bool drm_exec_cleanup(struct drm_exec *exec);
>  int drm_exec_lock_obj(struct drm_exec *exec, struct drm_gem_object *obj);
> +int drm_exec_lock_obj_report_dup(struct drm_exec *exec,
> +				 struct drm_gem_object *obj);
>  void drm_exec_unlock_obj(struct drm_exec *exec, struct drm_gem_object *obj);
>  int drm_exec_prepare_obj(struct drm_exec *exec, struct drm_gem_object *obj,
>  			 unsigned int num_fences);
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-06  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-03 16:31 [PATCH 00/10] Use drm_exec to lock TTM buffers, respin Natalie Vock
2026-07-03 16:31 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/exec: Add helper to bypass IGNORE_DUPLICATES flag Natalie Vock
2026-07-06  8:43   ` Christian König [this message]
2026-07-03 16:31 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/ttm: replace TTMs refcount with the DRM refcount v4 Natalie Vock
2026-07-06 13:14   ` Thomas Hellström
2026-07-06 14:49     ` Christian König
2026-07-06 17:01       ` Thomas Hellström
2026-07-06 17:51         ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-06 17:53           ` Thomas Hellström
2026-07-06 18:03             ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-06 18:05               ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-07  6:30                 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-07-06 18:03           ` Thomas Hellström
2026-07-06 18:23         ` Christian König
2026-07-06 22:26           ` Dave Airlie
2026-07-07  6:56           ` Thomas Hellström
2026-07-07  7:35             ` Natalie Vock
2026-07-03 16:31 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/ttm: remove ttm_lru_walk_ops Natalie Vock
2026-07-06 12:34   ` Thomas Hellström
2026-07-06 13:05     ` Christian König
2026-07-06 16:31       ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-06 13:08     ` Natalie Vock
2026-07-03 16:31 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/ttm: grab BO reference before locking it Natalie Vock
2026-07-03 16:31 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/ttm: switch to ttm_bo_lru_for_each_reserved_guarded for swapout Natalie Vock
2026-07-03 16:31 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/ttm: move zombie handling into ttm_bo_evict Natalie Vock
2026-07-03 16:31 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/ttm: use ttm_bo_lru_for_each_reserved_guarded in evict_all Natalie Vock
2026-07-03 16:31 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/xe: remove workaround for TTM internals Natalie Vock
2026-07-03 16:31 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/ttm: support using drm_exec during eviction v4 Natalie Vock
2026-07-03 16:31 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/amdgpu: use drm_exec during BO validation Natalie Vock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=84fe315a-bbf2-4dc8-bc75-89e5743d0ea8@amd.com \
    --to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=natalie.vock@gmx.de \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox