public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Discrepancies between /proc/cpuinfo and Dave J's  x86i
Date: 12 Jul 2001 08:58:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84jaV$Qmw-B@khms.westfalen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107111858110.1811-100000@Appserv.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <p05100361b77232f67994@[207.213.214.37]> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107111858110.1811-100000@Appserv.suse.de>

davej@suse.de (Dave Jones)  wrote on 11.07.01 in <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107111858110.1811-100000@Appserv.suse.de>:

> Given the PR disaster that the P3 serial number brought about,
> I'd be surprised if Intel were to revisit that chapter of history :)

Though much of that has been bad PR handling, I think. It's not as if  
Intel invented that feature - for example, every s390 system has one (and  
so did the whole family at least since the /370, used for licenses, for  
example), and everything living on ethernet is supposed to have a unique  
MAC address. (Which *has* already been used in tracing authors of  
malicious Windows software, I believe.)

OTOH, ISTR that under VM, it's possible to simulate the /370 etc. cpuid of  
someone else. Which I know has been used to circumvent license  
restrictions.

Then again, the US custom of using the SSN as a generic index would be  
rather illegal over here, so that might change peoples attitudes to the  
mere existance of those numbers - it does make a difference how big a  
stick you can wield.

Not that any of this is important to Linux ...

MfG Kai

  reply	other threads:[~2001-07-12  7:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-11  3:19 Discrepancies between /proc/cpuinfo and Dave J's x86info Jordan
2001-07-11  4:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-07-11  4:37   ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-11  4:44     ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-07-11  5:04       ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-11 11:00 ` Dave Jones
2001-07-11 12:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2001-07-11 12:23   ` Dave Jones
2001-07-11 14:09     ` [PATCH] " Hugh Dickins
2001-07-11 14:28       ` Dave Jones
2001-07-11 16:47         ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-11 17:00           ` Dave Jones
2001-07-12  6:58             ` Kai Henningsen [this message]
2001-10-10  1:38           ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-07-11 16:29       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-11 15:51     ` Jordan Breeding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='84jaV$Qmw-B@khms.westfalen.de' \
    --to=kaih@khms.westfalen.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox