From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Discrepancies between /proc/cpuinfo and Dave J's x86i
Date: 12 Jul 2001 08:58:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84jaV$Qmw-B@khms.westfalen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107111858110.1811-100000@Appserv.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <p05100361b77232f67994@[207.213.214.37]> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107111858110.1811-100000@Appserv.suse.de>
davej@suse.de (Dave Jones) wrote on 11.07.01 in <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107111858110.1811-100000@Appserv.suse.de>:
> Given the PR disaster that the P3 serial number brought about,
> I'd be surprised if Intel were to revisit that chapter of history :)
Though much of that has been bad PR handling, I think. It's not as if
Intel invented that feature - for example, every s390 system has one (and
so did the whole family at least since the /370, used for licenses, for
example), and everything living on ethernet is supposed to have a unique
MAC address. (Which *has* already been used in tracing authors of
malicious Windows software, I believe.)
OTOH, ISTR that under VM, it's possible to simulate the /370 etc. cpuid of
someone else. Which I know has been used to circumvent license
restrictions.
Then again, the US custom of using the SSN as a generic index would be
rather illegal over here, so that might change peoples attitudes to the
mere existance of those numbers - it does make a difference how big a
stick you can wield.
Not that any of this is important to Linux ...
MfG Kai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-12 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-11 3:19 Discrepancies between /proc/cpuinfo and Dave J's x86info Jordan
2001-07-11 4:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-07-11 4:37 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-11 4:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-07-11 5:04 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-11 11:00 ` Dave Jones
2001-07-11 12:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2001-07-11 12:23 ` Dave Jones
2001-07-11 14:09 ` [PATCH] " Hugh Dickins
2001-07-11 14:28 ` Dave Jones
2001-07-11 16:47 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-11 17:00 ` Dave Jones
2001-07-12 6:58 ` Kai Henningsen [this message]
2001-10-10 1:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-07-11 16:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-11 15:51 ` Jordan Breeding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='84jaV$Qmw-B@khms.westfalen.de' \
--to=kaih@khms.westfalen.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox