public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Timo Juhani Lindfors <timo.lindfors@iki.fi>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: ananth@in.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"yrl.pp-manager.tt\@hitachi.com" <yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com>
Subject: Re: kprobing "hash_64.constprop.26" crashes the system, recursion through get_kprobe?
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:43:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84sj4fik71.fsf@sauna.l.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <513041D0.4010209@hitachi.com> (Masami Hiramatsu's message of "Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:51:12 +0900")

Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> writes:
>> I am unable to recreate this problem on a fedora system; hash_64 is
>> inlined AFAICS.

Thanks testing. How does the disassembly of get_kprobes look for you?

> I also tried and couldn't recreate hash_64 problem on my ubuntu 12.10.
> Could you tell us your kconfig?

Sure, see

http://lindi.iki.fi/lindi/config-3.7-trunk-amd64_3.7.3-1~experimental.1

Note that I am doing the tests under xen. Should I redo the tests under
kvm?

>> This is a clear case of recursion. Either of the two options should fix
>> the problem.
>
> I think __kprobes is better if it works, because it causes kprobes
> issue (no problem in other parts).
> (Again, since I can't reproduce this hash_64.constprop,
> I'm not sure that __kprobes can fix that clearly.)

Ok. My worry is that hash_64 is not the only function that is called
from a __kprobes marked function. For example kprobes_module_callback
calls mutex_lock. Should we also mark mutex_lock with __kprobes?

Based on the disassembly of code between __kprobes_text_start and
__kprobes_text_end I made a function call graph that shows functions
that get called from this region:

http://lindi.iki.fi/lindi/kprobes/function-call-graph1.png

The __kprobes functions are marked with red color. I had to omit
mutex_lock, mutex_unlock and printk from the graph to make it readable
(I also omited functions that don't call other functions). As you can
see, this is quite a minefield :)

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-01  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-27  9:42 kprobing "hash_64.constprop.26" crashes the system, recursion through get_kprobe? Timo Juhani Lindfors
2013-03-01  5:31 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2013-03-01  5:51   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-03-01  8:43     ` Timo Juhani Lindfors [this message]
2013-03-01 10:54       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-03-01 11:02         ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=84sj4fik71.fsf@sauna.l.org \
    --to=timo.lindfors@iki.fi \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox