From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62l: add initial infrastructure
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 12:04:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <859a4fc2-45f5-4d72-9727-7979e4c15bd5@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250411182608.cpxr357humjq6ln7@bryanbrattlof.com>
On 11/04/2025 20:26, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
>>> +
>>> + usb0_phy_ctrl: syscon@45000 {
>>> + compatible = "ti,am62-usb-phy-ctrl", "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x45000 0x4>;
>>> + bootph-all;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + usb1_phy_ctrl: syscon@45004 {
>>> + compatible = "ti,am62-usb-phy-ctrl", "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x45004 0x4>;
>>
>> No, you do not get syscon per register. The entire point of syscon is to
>> collect ALL registers. Your device is the syscon, not a register.
>>
>
> My understanding from [0] was that we would need to break this up into
> smaller syscon nodes because the alternative would be to mark the entire
> region as a syscon and every other node using it would need to use it's
> base + offset which was kinda undesirable especially for the small
> number of drivers that need data from this region.
>
> a-device {
> clocks = <&epwm_tbclk 0>;
Hm? That's how you use the syscon, so how it can be undesirable?
Anyway, one register is not a device, so no device node per register.
In the link you provided I was repeating the same, so you got same
review in multiple places.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-12 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-07 15:34 [PATCH v4 0/3] arm64: dts: ti: introduce basic support for the AM62L Bryan Brattlof
2025-04-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add binding for AM62L SoCs Bryan Brattlof
2025-04-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62l: add initial infrastructure Bryan Brattlof
2025-04-07 17:46 ` Nishanth Menon
2025-04-07 21:34 ` Bryan Brattlof
2025-04-07 18:09 ` Andrew Davis
2025-04-07 21:35 ` Bryan Brattlof
2025-04-09 7:17 ` krzk
2025-04-11 18:26 ` Bryan Brattlof
2025-04-12 10:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-04-16 14:42 ` Bryan Brattlof
2025-04-17 5:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-04-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62l: add initial reference board file Bryan Brattlof
2025-04-08 1:47 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] arm64: dts: ti: introduce basic support for the AM62L Rob Herring (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=859a4fc2-45f5-4d72-9727-7979e4c15bd5@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=bb@ti.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox