public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mm-hotfixes tree
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 15:28:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <85cf30d9-afd9-44aa-98de-1509e95bcf31@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <955d11fa-a9a1-4956-8d2f-269ccc3f2911@sirena.org.uk>

On 4/21/26 15:21, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 03:06:32PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>> On 4/21/26 14:59, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>>> After merging the mm-hotfixes tree, today's linux-next build (arm64
>>> allnoconfig) failed like this:
> 
>>> ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
>>> ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages detected!
>>> ld: arch/arm64/mm/fault.o: in function `tag_clear_highpages':
>>> fault.c:(.text+0xc40): undefined reference to `mte_clear_page_tags'
> 
>>> Caused by commit
> 
>>>   99e63a49650cc (mm/page_alloc: fix initialization of tags of the huge zero folio with init_on_free)
> 
>> The patch will get resent (and should not have immediately been queued
>> in the mm-hotfixes branch).
> 
>> Feel free to drop the patch on your tree.
> 
> To be clear linux-next merges the trees that maintainers are publishing,
> the standard fix for straight failures like this is to merge the last
> version that worked.  Sometimes reverts do get applied but more usually
> for things that only come up in the final builds.

If that unblocks you, great.

> 
>>> I have used the version from next-20260420 instead.  The commit removed
> 
> The commit is also present in the mm-unstable tree, I have also used
> the version of that from 20260420.

Yeah, it should have landed on mm-new first for 1/2 days.

-- 
Cheers,

David

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-21 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-21 12:59 linux-next: build failure after merge of the mm-hotfixes tree Mark Brown
2026-04-21 13:06 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-21 13:21   ` Mark Brown
2026-04-21 13:28     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-04-21 13:34     ` Mark Brown
2026-04-21 13:42       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-21 14:17         ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-21 14:20           ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-21 14:28             ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-21 14:35               ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-21 14:48                 ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-21 15:04                   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-21 16:04                     ` Philip Li
2026-04-21 16:21                       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-21 14:28           ` Mark Brown
2026-04-21 14:39             ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-12-07 21:35 Stephen Rothwell
2025-12-08 10:30 ` Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2025-12-09  1:37   ` Andrew Morton
2025-08-21  6:05 Stephen Rothwell
2025-08-21  9:49 ` Harry Yoo
2025-05-28 23:59 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-29  0:02 ` Andrew Morton
2025-05-29  1:57   ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-29  0:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-01  0:16 Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-01  1:01 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-01 18:15   ` Yang Shi
2024-07-02 22:44     ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-02 23:22       ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-03  0:40         ` Yang Shi
2023-12-13 22:18 Stephen Rothwell
2023-12-13 23:31 ` Liam R. Howlett
2022-12-12 22:30 Stephen Rothwell
2022-12-13  1:34 ` Kefeng Wang
2022-12-13  2:23   ` Andrew Morton
2022-12-13  2:45     ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-12-13  2:54     ` Kefeng Wang
2022-11-25  1:10 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-25  5:24 ` Juergen Gross
2022-11-25  5:24 ` Andrew Morton
2022-11-25  5:48   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=85cf30d9-afd9-44aa-98de-1509e95bcf31@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox