From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C96E2877FB; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 07:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752131591; cv=none; b=IQqqTOFtEA4IpS5LO5/mWgbM0C9VVMM4WlG3zagqy3nvehMZxexSab5M5dRzWyOWYz+5qJYgP7H7n0kO8FDSggdAxwT+e3fXQV0PMYSx6lph1RyGG+mh+f0A+8wd0mbDdtv11tUV6mDgZM/fhpWNxEyquBcD20Uee+yKPQJqEZ4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752131591; c=relaxed/simple; bh=swtW+ZXga7xhQRN3PDVAmuLXUcGh09yYcwhConUBkmM=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc; b=aepRNm6RUSHlwiqteN0N83GcpCDUKjARnyGEBcjGcBArITdIsRKGLNygixkFFD5zRI9m9Y55oQU5im4U/4FGzL6sA7SSb+ftGjXb9J9438w1kHIYo02p+cKyLJvosr9AVDu5yeKeX8bQjqPVKkclUYeq1iO03pyJQFrwNMLYJ2E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nKAuITkq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nKAuITkq" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96832C4CEF4; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 07:13:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1752131591; bh=swtW+ZXga7xhQRN3PDVAmuLXUcGh09yYcwhConUBkmM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:From; b=nKAuITkqsb2naB9snjWW/pHegn8VLqiYiNKoXBP1sMkdgv20fOZu/V4I5IzMrkrR1 WYv0c9SpDAGlQ/kk0Cth27W7FY+pU1DBvFFPyaf02FeGjbgRaWxEcdkdTlHM2gO3qA vyLpnfU8euZ8q9sGt2HvNho7vHQGvvm3DNzI/OwkOhjm1McL9wfaOMyu6zyneDNPyX KwyqdUsCGt8Q6jnvBucJXf3I0xw2kQVzbne2/aUuQ11pPb/5Vti+uw17YpvSXVytv3 XAOJsIzxQxXuhGCgVGpEXn0ZcZogiPOs1IIssH50SCpsSO2ZGTEws2Y/TG448M6g+n N6od825biFIYQ== Message-ID: <85f1ee594f02802fd5a019fa5ade999a@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 07:13:08 +0000 From: "Maxime Ripard" To: "Luca Ceresoli" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/bridge: imx93-mipi-dsi: use drm_bridge_chain_get_last_bridge() In-Reply-To: <20250709-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-drm_bridge_get_next_bridge-v1-3-48920b9cf369@bootlin.com> References: <20250709-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-drm_bridge_get_next_bridge-v1-3-48920b9cf369@bootlin.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrzej Hajda" , "David Airlie" , "Fabio Estevam" , "Hui Pu" , "Jernej Skrabec" , "Jonas Karlman" , "Laurent Pinchart" , "Liu Ying" , "Maarten Lankhorst" , "Maxime Ripard" , "Neil Armstrong" , "Pengutronix Kernel Team" , "Philipp Zabel" , "Robert Foss" , "Sascha Hauer" , "Shawn Guo" , "Simona Vetter" , "Thomas Petazzoni" , "Thomas Zimmermann" , "Tomi Valkeinen" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 18:48:02 +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > Use drm_bridge_chain_get_last_bridge() instead of open coding a loop with > two invocations of drm_bridge_get_next_bridge() per iteration. >=20 > Besides being cleaner and more efficient, this change is necessary in > preparation for drm_bridge_get_next_bridge() to get a reference to the >=20 > [ ... ] Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard Thanks! Maxime