From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: agk@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, song@kernel.org,
breeves@redhat.com, mpatocka@redhat.com, khazhy@google.com,
kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Historical Service Time Path Selector
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 13:11:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85ftc6l7lb.fsf@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200511170235.GA7719@redhat.com> (Mike Snitzer's message of "Mon, 11 May 2020 13:02:35 -0400")
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, May 11 2020 at 12:39pm -0400,
> Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This fourth version of HST applies the suggestion from Mikulas Patocka
>> to do the ktime_get_ns inside the mpath map_bio instead of generic
>> device-mapper code. This means that struct dm_mpath_io gained another
>> 64bit field. For the request-based case, we continue to use the block
>> layer start time information.
>>
>> With this modification, I was able obtain similar performance on BIO
>> to request-based multipath with HST on the benchmarks shared in v1.
>>
>> v3: https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2020-April/msg00308.html
>> v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2020-April/msg00270.html
>> v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2020-April/msg00176.html
>
> I already staged your v3 in linux-next. Please provide an incremental
> patch that layers on this git branch:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/log/?h=dm-5.8
>
> I was hopeful for a flag to be set (e.g. in 'struct path_selector') to
> reflect whether the path selector expects highres start_time. Makes
> little sense to incur that extra cost of providing the time if the path
> selector doesn't even use it.
>
> Alternatively, could split out the setting of the time needed by .end_io
> to a new path_selector_type method (e.g. .set_start_time). And then
> only use ktime_get_ns() for bio-based if .set_start_time is defined.
> Would get a little fiddly needing to make sure a stale start_time isn't
> used... also, makes more sense to conditionally call this
> .set_start_time just after .start_io is.
Oh, my apologies, I hadn't noticed it was merged. I will make the time fetch
conditional and submit a new patch based on that branch.
Thanks,
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-11 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-11 16:39 [PATCH v4 0/2] Historical Service Time Path Selector Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2020-05-11 16:39 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] md: mpath: Pass IO start time to path selector Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2020-05-11 16:39 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] md: mpath: Add Historical Service Time Path Selector Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2020-05-11 17:02 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Mike Snitzer
2020-05-11 17:11 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [this message]
2020-05-11 17:31 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-05-11 18:41 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-05-11 18:46 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2020-05-20 23:26 ` [dm-devel] " Xose Vazquez Perez
2020-05-21 0:15 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85ftc6l7lb.fsf@collabora.com \
--to=krisman@collabora.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=breeves@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=khazhy@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox