From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/8] arm64/mm: Use reduced VA sizes (36/39/42 bits) only for user space
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 12:44:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <861pzx3gll.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241030101803.2037606-17-ardb+git@google.com>
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 10:18:11 +0000,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com> wrote:
>
> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
>
> The advantage of a reduced virtual address space size is its impact on
> the number of translation levels, which affects TLB pressure. The
> working set of translations covering the kernel side is negligible
> compared to user space, where each process has its own set of page
> tables, and so most of the same benefit can be obtained by reducing the
> VA size only for user space.
>
> As a preparatory step towards implementing this, drop all the reduced VA
> space sizes in Kconfig, and replace it with a configurable userland VA
> space size that is reflected in TASK_SIZE. This will be taken advantage
> of in a subsequent patch to actually reduce the number of translations
> used by the MMU for translating user space virtual addresses.
I think this may have an impact on KVM's walking of the userspace page
tables to determine whether we are trying to install a block mapping,
which assumes that the start level and the number of VA bits are the
same as the kernel (see get_user_mapping_size()).
Probably nothing too complicated, but something to look into.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-30 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-30 10:18 [RFC PATCH 0/8] arm64: Simplify VA space configurations Ard Biesheuvel
2024-10-30 10:18 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] arm64: Kconfig: force ARM64_PAN=y when enabling TTBR0 sw PAN Ard Biesheuvel
2024-10-30 10:18 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] arm64: Kconfig: fix ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS_MAX for 52-bit virtual addressing Ard Biesheuvel
2024-10-30 10:18 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] arm64: Kconfig: eliminate 64k/48-bit VA combination Ard Biesheuvel
2024-10-30 10:18 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] arm64: Kconfig: eliminate 4k/48-bit " Ard Biesheuvel
2024-10-30 10:18 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] arm64/Kconfig: Drop support for 47-bit virtual addressing Ard Biesheuvel
2024-10-30 10:18 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] arm64/Kconfig: Drop support for 48-bit " Ard Biesheuvel
2024-10-30 10:18 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] arm64/mm: Use reduced VA sizes (36/39/42 bits) only for user space Ard Biesheuvel
2024-10-30 12:44 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2024-10-30 13:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-10-30 10:18 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] arm64/mm: Account for reduced VA sizes in T0SZ and skip the levels Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=861pzx3gll.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb+git@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox