public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wayne.Brown@altec.com
To: Thomas Dodd <ted@cypress.com>, John Madden <weez@freelists.org>,
	"Petr Vandrovec" <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>,
	Jesper Juhl <juhl@eisenstein.dk>, Dax Kelson <dax@gurulabs.com>,
	Aaron Lunansky <alunansky@rim.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Current status of NTFS support
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 18:23:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86256A34.00808239.00@smtpnotes.altec.com> (raw)



Thanks to all who offered suggestions, both on the list and privately.  Rather
than answer them all individually, I'm going to respond in this one message.

Unfortunately the upgrade is not going to be done by me, but by our PC support
team.  Our laptops originally were set up with two FAT32 partitions:  a small
one for Win98 and applications, and a large one for data files.  I used FIPS to
carve off most of the large one for a swap partition and an ext2 partition.
Now, because of the larger space requirements of Win2000, they're going to wipe
out everything on the drives and start from scratch.  They'll be doing all our
laptops in a short period of time, and want to do all of them the same way.

>From everything I've been told here, it sounds like my best bet is to try and
talk them into replacing the two FAT32 partitions (which are contiguous) with
one big one and leave my Linux partitions alone.  That way I won't have to deal
with NTFS at all.  Fortunately, one of the PC support guys ought to be
sympathetic; he runs Linux at home and has asked me for advice in getting it set
up on his laptop, too.  I'll see if I can talk him into doing my machine
differently from the others.  I have to be careful, though; my Linux use at work
is tolerated, but not (yet) encouraged, and I don't want to rock the boat too
much.

Thanks again to everyone.

Wayne



             reply	other threads:[~2001-04-20 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-20 23:23 Wayne.Brown [this message]
2001-04-21 12:19 ` Current status of NTFS support mirabilos
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-20 22:08 Wayne.Brown
2001-04-20 22:31 ` Jesper Juhl
2001-04-20 22:33 ` Thomas Dodd
2001-04-20 23:48 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-04-20 23:52 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-04-20 23:55 ` Robert Szentmihalyi
2001-04-21  1:18   ` Lee Leahu
2001-04-21  1:34     ` J. Dow
2001-04-21  1:39     ` Doug McNaught
2001-04-21  2:07       ` Lee Leahu
2001-04-21  2:30         ` Tom Leete
2001-04-21  9:23       ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-04-21  2:35 ` Ben Ford
2001-04-21  9:53 ` Dan Podeanu
2001-04-21 10:35 ` lk
2001-04-22 14:42 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86256A34.00808239.00@smtpnotes.altec.com \
    --to=wayne.brown@altec.com \
    --cc=VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz \
    --cc=alunansky@rim.net \
    --cc=dax@gurulabs.com \
    --cc=juhl@eisenstein.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ted@cypress.com \
    --cc=weez@freelists.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox