From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 16:06:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 16:06:07 -0400 Received: from smtpnotes.altec.com ([209.149.164.10]:27913 "HELO smtpnotes.altec.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 16:05:52 -0400 X-Lotus-FromDomain: ALTEC From: Wayne.Brown@altec.com To: esr@thyrsus.com cc: Alan Cox , Keith Owens , CML2 , kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <86256A50.006E3D90.00@smtpnotes.altec.com> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 15:04:43 -0500 Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/18/2001 at 02:44:07 PM esr@thyrsus.com wrote: >But the real question is whether the old tools have enough value to be >worth the effort. What problem are you trying to solve here? How about: 1. Some of us are perfectly satisfied with the existing tools and don't want them to be yanked out from under us. 2. Some of us have no interest in Python and don't like being forced to deal with installing/upgrading it just for CML2. Wayne