public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wayne.Brown@altec.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 14:51:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86256BBC.006D500D.00@smtpnotes.altec.com> (raw)



Constructive comments would be appropriate if I wanted to help construct a new
kbuild.  The truth is that I'm quite happy with the current kbuild and don't
want it replaced with *anything* at all.  (That's the same reason I'm glad no
one's been talking about CML2 lately.)  The new one wouldn't bother me if the
user interface were *exactly* identical to the old one; i.e., if I could keep
typing exactly the same commands to build a kernel and get exactly the same
results and not be able to tell that anything had changed in the build process.

Personally, I wish that the only changes anybody made were to the kernel itself
(new drivers added, existing performance improved, etc.) and that all the
supporting tools and utilities just could be left alone.  I know that's not
going to happen, but anything that slows down changes in those extraneous things
is fine with me.  I'd be perfectly happy if *years* from now I was compiling
Linux 45.10.12 with the same kbuild, CML, gcc and everything else that I'm using
right now.





Adam Kropelin <akropel1@rochester.rr.com> on 05/17/2002 12:37:18 PM

To:   linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
cc:    (bcc: Wayne Brown/Corporate/Altec)

Subject:  Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3



On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 09:21:12AM -0500, Wayne.Brown@altec.com wrote:
>
>
> OTOH, those of us who are not looking forward to kbuild 2.5 are grateful for
any
> delays we can get.

...and what would your beefs (beeves?) with kbuild-2.5 be? I searched the
archives
for the last 12 months and I don't see anythinng from you relevant to
kbuild-2.5.
Keith has been addressing concerns quite regularly; I should think if you have
constructive comments, he'd surely listen.

You *do* have constructive comments, right?

--Adam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/





             reply	other threads:[~2002-05-17 19:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-17 19:51 Wayne.Brown [this message]
2002-05-17 20:09 ` kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 Dave Jones
2002-05-17 20:25   ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-18 13:15 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-19 10:26 Mike Galbraith
2002-05-18 10:25 Mike Galbraith
2002-05-18 17:32 ` Wayne.Brown
2002-05-18 18:11   ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-18 21:15   ` DervishD
2002-05-20  4:31   ` Mike Fedyk
2002-05-20  5:09     ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-05-20  5:18       ` Keith Owens
2002-05-20 14:29       ` Juan Quintela
2002-05-20  5:11     ` Keith Owens
2002-05-18  6:05 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-18 16:50 ` John Weber
2002-05-18  5:09 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-18  5:23 ` David Lang
2002-05-18 13:11 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-17 22:59 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 23:14 ` Robert Love
2002-05-18  4:01 ` Horst von Brand
2002-05-18 12:57 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-17 20:53 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 21:14 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-17 21:42   ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-17 22:16     ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-05-17 22:34       ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-17 22:40         ` Larry McVoy
2002-05-18  0:41       ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-05-17 22:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-18  0:38 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-05-17 14:56 James Bottomley
2002-05-17 14:21 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 17:37 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-05-17 18:00   ` Robert Love
2002-05-16 22:42 Keith Owens
2002-05-17  0:10 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-17  3:30   ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-17  7:55     ` Russell King
2002-05-17  8:42     ` Miles Lane
2002-05-17 13:11       ` Dave Jones
2002-05-17 13:09     ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-17  8:17       ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-17 13:39         ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-17  1:50 ` jeff millar
2002-05-17  2:04   ` Keith Owens
2002-05-17  2:26   ` Dave Jones
2002-05-17  7:11 ` Kenneth Johansson
2002-05-17 15:13   ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-17 15:19     ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-17 15:42       ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-18  1:39         ` Keith Owens
2002-05-18  2:11           ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-18  2:19             ` Keith Owens
2002-05-17 18:19 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-19 15:46 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86256BBC.006D500D.00@smtpnotes.altec.com \
    --to=wayne.brown@altec.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox