The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: Avoid WARN_ON for PHY_NOLINK during resuming
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:35:09 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86262217-a620-dc5b-cf5a-3a23ea869834@socionext.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d2d6349-6910-3e73-e6c5-db9041bcfdb8@gmail.com>

Hi Heiner,

Thank you for your comment.

On 2022/10/21 17:38, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 21.10.2022 09:41, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
>> When resuming from sleep, if there is a time lag from link-down to link-up
>> due to auto-negotiation, the phy status has been still PHY_NOLINK, so
>> WARN_ON dump occurs in mdio_bus_phy_resume(). For example, UniPhier AVE
>> ethernet takes about a few seconds to link up after resuming.
>>
> That autoneg takes some time is normal. If this would actually the root
> cause then basically every driver should be affected. But it's not.

Although the auto-neg should happen normally, I'm not sure about other
platforms.

>> To avoid this issue, should remove PHY_NOLINK the WARN_ON conditions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 8 ++++----
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> index 57849ac0384e..c647d027bb5d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> @@ -318,12 +318,12 @@ static __maybe_unused int mdio_bus_phy_resume(struct
>> device *dev)
>>   	phydev->suspended_by_mdio_bus = 0;
>>
>>   	/* If we managed to get here with the PHY state machine in a state
>> -	 * neither PHY_HALTED, PHY_READY nor PHY_UP, this is an indication
>> -	 * that something went wrong and we should most likely be using
>> -	 * MAC managed PM, but we are not.
>> +	 * neither PHY_HALTED, PHY_READY, PHY_UP nor PHY_NOLINK, this is an
>> +	 * indication that something went wrong and we should most likely
>> +	 * be using MAC managed PM, but we are not.
>>   	 */
> 
> Did you read the comment you're changing? ave_resume() calls phy_resume(),
> so you should follow the advice in the comment.

I understand something is wrong with "PHY_NOLINK" here, and need to investigate
the root cause of the phy state issue.

Thank you,

---
Best Regards
Kunihiko Hayashi

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-21  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-21  7:41 [PATCH net] net: phy: Avoid WARN_ON for PHY_NOLINK during resuming Kunihiko Hayashi
2022-10-21  8:38 ` Heiner Kallweit
2022-10-21  9:35   ` Kunihiko Hayashi [this message]
2022-10-21 11:12     ` Heiner Kallweit
2022-10-21 11:27       ` Kunihiko Hayashi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86262217-a620-dc5b-cf5a-3a23ea869834@socionext.com \
    --to=hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox