public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: Qiang Yu <qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MSIs not freed in GICv3 ITS driver
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 09:15:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <864ilv3xlp.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dkiv7mxouygrs7p3g57i4lngdsgtlwqww2ynsx7fo52mrla73x@5j3xs2ry65oc>

On Wed, 01 Apr 2026 08:59:02 +0100,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 09:17:10AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Mar 2026 09:26:32 +0000,
> > Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > The above issue should be applicable to other MSI controller drivers as well,
> > > not just DWC.
> > 
> > The core issue is not with the irqchips, but with the MSI subsystem.
> > 
> > Multi-MSI devices should always result in a strict power-of-2
> > allocation, because that's all the HW supports. Yet, we let drivers
> > request a stupid number of interrupts.
> > 
> > I can see two outcomes: either we force the allocation to the next 2^
> > value, or we return an error to the caller. The first one costs memory
> > (extra irq descriptors), the latter forces people to fix their crap.
> > 
> > I'm tempted to propose the latter.
> > 
> 
> That might cause a lot of regressions I believe. IMO, safe bet would be to
> handle the power of 2 allocations inside the irqchip drivers.

What part of "this is a violation of the PCI spec" did you miss? I
didn't realise we were in the business of adding crap just because
endpoint drivers are broken.

In any case, I'm not touching the ITS driver.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-01  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-08 15:39 MSIs not freed in GICv3 ITS driver Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-07-08 17:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-07-09 17:37   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-07-09 19:24     ` Marc Zyngier
2024-07-21  8:50       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-01-16 15:03         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-02-19 16:54           ` Marc Zyngier
2026-02-25  9:34             ` Qiang Yu
2026-02-26 13:39               ` Marc Zyngier
2026-03-03  5:22                 ` Qiang Yu
2026-03-03  9:26                 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-30  8:17                   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-04-01  7:59                     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-04-01  8:15                       ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2026-04-01 12:01                         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-04-01 16:08                           ` Marc Zyngier
2026-04-01 17:37                             ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-04-07 10:45                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-07 12:18                               ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=864ilv3xlp.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox