From: yhlu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>, YhLu <YhLu@tyan.com>,
Peter Buckingham <peter@pantasys.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"discuss@x86-64.org" <discuss@x86-64.org>
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: 2.6.13-rc2 with dual way dual core ck804 MB
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:42:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86802c4405081016421db9baa5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050810232614.GC27628@wotan.suse.de>
andi,
you can see the difference with the patch
Booting processor 1/1 rip 6000 rsp ffff810181c61f58
Initializing CPU#1
masked ExtINT on CPU#1
Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4000.31 BogoMIPS (lpj=8000624)
CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
CPU: L2 Cache: 1024K (64 bytes/line)
stepping 0a
CPU 1: Syncing TSC to CPU 0.
CPU 1: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff 0 cycles, maxerr 886 cycles)
Booting processor 2/2 rip 6000 rsp ffff81017ffa3f58
Initializing CPU#2
masked ExtINT on CPU#2
Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4000.30 BogoMIPS (lpj=8000605)
CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
CPU: L2 Cache: 1024K (64 bytes/line)
stepping 0a
CPU 2: Syncing TSC to CPU 0.
CPU 2: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff 1 cycles, maxerr 901 cycles)
Booting processor 3/3 rip 6000 rsp ffff8101fffa9f58
Initializing CPU#3
masked ExtINT on CPU#3
Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4000.31 BogoMIPS (lpj=8000622)
CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
CPU: L2 Cache: 1024K (64 bytes/line)
stepping 0a
CPU 3: Syncing TSC to CPU 0.
CPU 3: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff -3 cycles, maxerr 1504 cycles)
Brought up 4 CPUs
without the patch
Booting processor 1/4 APIC 0x1
Initializing CPU#1
masked ExtINT on CPU#1
Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4000.30 BogoMIPS (lpj=8000608)
CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
CPU: L2 Cache: 1024K (64 bytes/line)
CPU 1(1) -> Node 1 -> Core 0
stepping 0a
CPU 1: Syncing TSC to CPU 0.
Booting processor 2/4 APIC 0x2
Initializing CPU#2
masked ExtINT on CPU#2
CPU 1: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff 1 cycles, maxerr 893 cycles)
Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4000.36 BogoMIPS (lpj=8000724)
CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
CPU: L2 Cache: 1024K (64 bytes/line)
CPU 2(1) -> Node 2 -> Core 0
stepping 0a
CPU 2: Syncing TSC to CPU 0.
Booting processor 3/4 APIC 0x3
Initializing CPU#3
masked ExtINT on CPU#3
CPU 2: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff 0 cycles, maxerr 904 cycles)
Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4000.16 BogoMIPS (lpj=8000335)
CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
CPU: L2 Cache: 1024K (64 bytes/line)
CPU 3(1) -> Node 3 -> Core 0
stepping 0a
CPU 3: Syncing TSC to CPU 0.
Brought up 4 CPUs
time.c: Using PIT/TSC based timekeeping.
testing NMI watchdog ... OK.
checking if image is initramfs...<6>CPU 3: synchronized TSC with CPU 0
(last diff -18 cycles, maxerr 1504 cycles)
it isn't (no cpio magic); looks like an initrd
So my patch still can be used with Eric's, It just serialize the
TSC_SYNC between cpu.
I wonder it you can refine to make TSC_SYNC serialize that beteen CPU.
That will make
CPU X:synchronized TSC ...
in fixed postion and timming.
YH
On 8/10/05, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 04:14:19PM -0700, Mike Waychison wrote:
> > YhLu wrote:
> > >andi,
> > >
> > >please refer the patch, it will move cpu_set(, cpu_callin_map) from
> > >smi_callin to start_secondary.
> >
> >
> > This patch fixes an apparent race / lockup on our 2-way dual cores (when
> > applied against 2.6.12.3). The machine was locking up after
> > "Initializing CPU#2".
>
> The real solution for this issue is the smp_call_function_single patch from Eric
> that I reposted yesterday. Yh's patch just changed the timing slightly.
>
>
> -Andi
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-10 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-07 0:56 2.6.13-rc2 with dual way dual core ck804 MB YhLu
2005-08-10 23:14 ` Mike Waychison
2005-08-10 23:26 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-08-10 23:42 ` yhlu [this message]
2005-08-11 0:04 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-11 0:17 ` yhlu
2005-08-11 0:23 ` yhlu
2005-08-11 0:28 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-11 0:43 ` yhlu
2005-08-11 0:51 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-12 6:59 ` yhlu
2005-08-12 7:04 ` yhlu
2005-08-12 13:07 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-12 16:18 ` yhlu
2005-08-12 16:41 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-12 17:36 ` yhlu
2005-08-10 23:49 ` Mike Waychison
2005-08-10 23:31 ` Peter Buckingham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86802c4405081016421db9baa5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=YhLu@tyan.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=peter@pantasys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox