From: yhlu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@quantumlinux.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Fix apicid versus cpu# confusion.
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:51:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86802c4405081122513625c081@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1hddvwzke.fsf_-_@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
So boot_cpu_id is apic id of BSP.
Anyway sync_tsc(...) there is master and MASTER..., but value are all 0.
YH
On 8/11/05, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> Ok being impatient not wanting this tiny bug to be forgotten for
> 2.6.13. Linus please apply this micro patch.
>
> > > static void __cpuinit tsc_sync_wait(void)
> > > {
> > > if (notscsync || !cpu_has_tsc)
> > > return;
> > > - printk(KERN_INFO "CPU %d: Syncing TSC to CPU %u.\n", smp_processor_id(),
> > > - boot_cpu_id);
> > > - sync_tsc();
> > > + sync_tsc(boot_cpu_id);
> >
> > I actually found a bug in this today. This should be sync_tsc(0), not
> > sync_tsc(boot_cpu_id)
> > Can you just fix it in your tree or should I submit a new patch?
> >
> > -Andi
>
> Oops. I knew I didn't have the physical versus logical cpu identifiers right
> when I generated that patch. It's not nearly as bad as I feared at the time
> though.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> ---
>
> arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> 5192895f71c7eff7e1335cd9d6a775dda2bb5d52
> diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c
> --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static void __cpuinit tsc_sync_wait(void
> {
> if (notscsync || !cpu_has_tsc)
> return;
> - sync_tsc(boot_cpu_id);
> + sync_tsc(0);
> }
>
> static __init int notscsync_setup(char *s)
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-12 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-11 22:54 [patch 0/8] -stable review Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 1/8] [PATCH] sys_set_mempolicy() doesnt check if mode < 0 Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 2/8] [PATCH] Fix SRAT for non dual core AMD systems Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 3/8] [PATCH] x86_64: Fixing smpboot timing problem Chris Wright
2005-08-11 23:33 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-11 23:43 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-12 2:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-08-12 4:26 ` [PATCH] x86_64: Fix apicid versus cpu# confusion Eric W. Biederman
2005-08-12 5:51 ` yhlu [this message]
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 4/8] [PATCH] Update in-kernel zlib routines Chris Wright
2005-08-12 0:01 ` Peter Osterlund
2005-08-12 0:11 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 5/8] Check input buffer size in zisofs Chris Wright
2005-08-12 1:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-08-12 1:16 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 6/8] CAN-2005-2098 Error during attempt to join key management session can leave semaphore pinned Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 7/8] CAN-2005-2099 Destruction of failed keyring oopses Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 8/8] [PATCH] Module per-cpu alignment cannot always be met Chris Wright
2005-08-22 6:58 ` Denis Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86802c4405081122513625c081@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=chuckw@quantumlinux.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jmforbes@linuxtx.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox