From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, asml.silence@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: fam.zheng@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] io_uring: avoid ring quiesce while registering/unregistering eventfd
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 09:57:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86ae792e-d138-112e-02bb-ab70e3c2a147@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220202155923.4117285-1-usama.arif@bytedance.com>
On 2/2/22 8:59 AM, Usama Arif wrote:
> Acquire completion_lock at the start of __io_uring_register before
> registering/unregistering eventfd and release it at the end. Hence
> all calls to io_cqring_ev_posted which adds to the eventfd counter
> will finish before acquiring the spin_lock in io_uring_register, and
> all new calls will wait till the eventfd is registered. This avoids
> ring quiesce which is much more expensive than acquiring the spin_lock.
>
> On the system tested with this patch, io_uring_reigster with
> IORING_REGISTER_EVENTFD takes less than 1ms, compared to 15ms before.
This seems like optimizing for the wrong thing, so I've got a few
questions. Are you doing a lot of eventfd registrations (and unregister)
in your workload? Or is it just the initial pain of registering one? In
talking to Pavel, he suggested that RCU might be a good use case here,
and I think so too. That would still remove the need to quiesce, and the
posted side just needs a fairly cheap rcu read lock/unlock around it.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-02 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-02 15:59 [RFC] io_uring: avoid ring quiesce while registering/unregistering eventfd Usama Arif
2022-02-02 16:57 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-02-02 18:32 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-02-02 18:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-02-02 19:18 ` Jens Axboe
2022-02-03 15:14 ` [External] " Usama Arif
2022-02-03 15:44 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-02-03 15:55 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86ae792e-d138-112e-02bb-ab70e3c2a147@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=fam.zheng@bytedance.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=usama.arif@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox