From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 8/9] dt-bindings: mux-adg792a: document devicetree bindings for ADG792A/G mux
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 18:05:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86bfcc29-df24-d877-915f-d62fc3987c05@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3fa5b6f0-76c1-0ca6-978e-9407a44a2e7e@axentia.se>
On 02/01/17 16:01, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-01-01 12:00, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 30/11/16 08:17, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> Analog Devices ADG792A/G is a triple 4:1 mux.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
>> Few comments inline. Worth adding anything about the gpio (output pins) to
>> the binding at this stage as well? Would certainly be nice to support
>> them.
>
> I'll add optional properties "gpio-controller;" and "#gpio-cells = <2>;"
> with the usual interpretation in v7 (but no implementation...) Is that
> enough?
>
>> Jonathan
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/misc/mux-adg792a.txt | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/mux-adg792a.txt
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/mux-adg792a.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/mux-adg792a.txt
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..4677f9ab1c55
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/mux-adg792a.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
>>> +Bindings for Analog Devices ADG792A/G Triple 4:1 Multiplexers
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible : "adi,adg792a" or "adi,adg792g"
>>> +- #mux-control-cells : <0> if parallel, or <1> if not.
>>> +* Standard mux-controller bindings as decribed in mux-controller.txt
>>> +
>>> +Optional properties:
>>> +- adi,parallel : if present, the three muxes are bound together with a single
>>> + mux controller, controlling all three muxes in parallel.
>>> +- adi,idle-state : if present, array of states the three mux controllers will
>>> + have when idle (or, if parallel, a single idle-state).
>> Hmm. These are actually a policy decision. As only one policy will make
>> sense for a given set of hardware probably fine to have it in here I guess.
>> Might be worth adding a note to say this though.
>
> I don't really know what you want me to add, do you have a suggestion for the
> wording?
>
>>> +
>>> +Mux controller states 0 through 3 correspond to signals A through D in the
>>> +datasheet. Mux controller states 4 and 5 are only available as possible idle
>>> +states. State 4 represents that nothing is connected, and state 5 represents
>>> +that the mux controller keeps the mux in its previously selected state during
>>> +the idle period. State 5 is the default idle state.
>> I'm never a great fan of magic numbers. Can we represent this more cleanly by
>> breaking it into multiple properties?
>> Optional:
>> adi,idle-switch-to-channel : switch to this channel when idle.
>> adi,idle-high-impedance : <boolean> the nothing connected state?
>>
>> If neither present leaves it in previous state?
>
> It's not that easy. adi,idle-state is an array when there are three single
> pole quadruple throw muxes, so there really needs to be a number for each
> desired idle-behavior. Unless you have a better idea for how to describe
> that?
The above with arrays for each of the two parameters?
Though then you need a priority documented - I'd say high impedance overrides
the channel selection if both are present.
>
> Cheers,
> peda
>
>>> +
>>> +Example:
>>> +
>>> + /* three independent mux controllers (of which one is used) */
>>> + &i2c0 {
>>> + mux: adg792a@50 {
>>> + compatible = "adi,adg792a";
>>> + reg = <0x50>;
>>> + #mux-control-cells = <1>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + adc-mux {
>>> + compatible = "iio-mux";
>>> + io-channels = <&adc 0>;
>>> + io-channel-names = "parent";
>>> +
>>> + mux-controls = <&mux 1>;
>>> +
>>> + channels = "sync-1", "", "out";
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Three parallel muxes with one mux controller, useful e.g. if
>>> + * the adc is differential, thus needing two signals to be muxed
>>> + * simultaneously for correct operation.
>>> + */
>>> + &i2c0 {
>>> + pmux: adg792a@50 {
>>> + compatible = "adi,adg792a";
>>> + reg = <0x50>;
>>> + #mux-control-cells = <0>;
>>> + adi,parallel;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + diff-adc-mux {
>>> + compatible = "iio-mux";
>>> + io-channels = <&adc 0>;
>>> + io-channel-names = "parent";
>>> +
>>> + mux-controls = <&pmux>;
>>> +
>>> + channels = "sync-1", "", "out";
>>> + };
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-02 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-30 8:16 [PATCH v6 0/9] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes Peter Rosin
2016-11-30 8:16 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] dt-bindings: document devicetree bindings for mux-controllers and mux-gpio Peter Rosin
2016-12-31 16:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-30 8:16 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] misc: minimal mux subsystem and gpio-based mux controller Peter Rosin
2016-12-31 16:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-01-02 9:14 ` Peter Rosin
2017-01-02 9:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-30 8:16 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] iio: inkern: api for manipulating ext_info of iio channels Peter Rosin
2016-12-31 15:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-30 8:16 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] dt-bindings: iio: iio-mux: document iio-mux bindings Peter Rosin
2016-11-30 8:52 ` Peter Rosin
2016-11-30 8:57 ` Peter Rosin
2016-12-05 23:26 ` Rob Herring
2016-12-06 9:18 ` Peter Rosin
2016-12-10 18:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-12-12 12:18 ` Peter Rosin
2016-12-31 16:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-30 8:16 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] iio: multiplexer: new iio category and iio-mux driver Peter Rosin
2016-12-31 16:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-30 8:17 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-mux-simple: document i2c-mux-simple bindings Peter Rosin
2016-11-30 8:17 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] i2c: i2c-mux-simple: new driver Peter Rosin
2017-01-01 10:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-01-01 15:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-02 15:30 ` Peter Rosin
2016-11-30 8:17 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] dt-bindings: mux-adg792a: document devicetree bindings for ADG792A/G mux Peter Rosin
2017-01-01 11:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-01-02 16:01 ` Peter Rosin
2017-01-02 18:05 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2017-01-02 20:47 ` Peter Rosin
2017-01-02 21:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-01-03 6:44 ` Peter Rosin
2016-11-30 8:17 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] misc: mux-adg792a: add mux controller driver for ADG792A/G Peter Rosin
2017-01-01 11:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-01-02 11:00 ` Peter Rosin
2017-01-02 18:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-01-01 11:28 ` [PATCH v6 0/9] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86bfcc29-df24-d877-915f-d62fc3987c05@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox