From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52B9732142E; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757519068; cv=none; b=ToZSdH9L1IJe1KRIL7APkh4zmx8aWE/pMNhyXVnQ3dxIzSAe4WqGUfGAY2/KdqFYxHDvaDl8BoEBBS0VJawAVobb9rTIOwRELU+JHz2MOFyb9QSRsYIOtA9hiiBrtFGg1E9L1VoAs0Z/XXeXk3EkH6SepvdWZixQt5eF8A0RRQI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757519068; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hZvf428NJm3tglfEUi2vJrUJuOlaIYiDR0+raY/wPso=; h=Date:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZMXFXY0BnNIO6vF7pgbCrD+cbOz09OK/dmTgmLQ7iXzL30/lquJvjewZJRjVgDkKK5vpvqsvr26YUMm6URe0EVETw2qBvstCCyTYDmuPS02b5SHKtPo+ls3IQnrag/+V6vFhWVWWHfe5BEVQoPQk5mds/IV+n7q07EDVN995Sck= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=pht8c1nJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="pht8c1nJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AECCC4CEEB; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:44:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757519068; bh=hZvf428NJm3tglfEUi2vJrUJuOlaIYiDR0+raY/wPso=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pht8c1nJshmEImS7kVld68fWJKIT/o8vO3LMrzdXZENzVbUcHsr8HCSo6MeqsrvOH U0GH1ksio98XP1ZWfQBwBD4qmGe1F0TKEtTW8Jd65rOxZJeUvyNOPLnU5Zn7D7QS5j ThP1Uuv+1yYlBdP+tOAcUD8MSMlkYyw4UqjIZIdWVFxvnKm/u6QV3thY1FNMGez6pr cf14NfzLQkReSxV5gcdBi16fNhMkDfGduDzE/7USOve5QXeo1H/We6mTjAhoWlr5hQ WHFBtbkiSVE40lgwXSonK8qAw9Uldm/XoYRqQutzeeuUgSRzwu+cyl8olMITIb/Gf0 a6yLYSKfUegRw== Received: from sofa.misterjones.org ([185.219.108.64] helo=goblin-girl.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uwMzh-000000054tS-3N7R; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:44:25 +0000 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 16:44:25 +0100 Message-ID: <86cy7ycnxi.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland , Will Deacon , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rob Herring , Saravana Kannan , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sven Peter , Janne Grunau , Suzuki K Poulose , James Clark Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/25] genirq: Allow per-cpu interrupt sharing for non-overlapping affinities In-Reply-To: <87h5xatlei.ffs@tglx> References: <20250908163127.2462948-1-maz@kernel.org> <20250908163127.2462948-16-maz@kernel.org> <86ecsed84s.wl-maz@kernel.org> <87h5xatlei.ffs@tglx> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/30.1 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 185.219.108.64 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, will@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, saravanak@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sven@kernel.org, j@jannau.net, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, james.clark@linaro.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:47:01 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 10 2025 at 09:28, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On Mon, 08 Sep 2025 17:31:17 +0100, > > As Will points out off the list, the above lacks the a similar > > handling for percpu_devid NMIs, leading to NMIs that are only handled > > on the first affinity group. > > > > It's easy enough to move the above to common code and share it with > > handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi(), but at this point there is hardly > > any difference with handle_percpu_devid_irq(). > > > > Any objection to simply killing the NMI version? > > Removing code is always appreciated :) > Works for me! M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.