Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] memory: tegra186-emc: Simplify and handle deferred probe with dev_err_probe()

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 06/11/2025 13:04, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 11/09/2025 10:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Certain calls, like clk_get, can cause probe deferral and driver should
>> handle it.  Use dev_err_probe() to fix that and also change other
>> non-deferred errors cases to make the code simpler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186-emc.c | 14 ++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186-emc.c b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186-emc.c
>> index 00baa7ab89214b1a151ab0c0a9ab76f90f922478..a0de80afe3e90531fcfb29d20773aed0d04478c5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186-emc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186-emc.c
>> @@ -302,9 +302,8 @@ static int tegra_emc_interconnect_init(struct tegra186_emc *emc)
>>   
>>   remove_nodes:
>>   	icc_nodes_remove(&emc->provider);
>> -	dev_err(emc->dev, "failed to initialize ICC: %d\n", err);
>>   
>> -	return err;
>> +	return dev_err_probe(emc->dev, err, "failed to initialize ICC\n");
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int tegra186_emc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> @@ -319,14 +318,13 @@ static int tegra186_emc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   
>>   	emc->bpmp = tegra_bpmp_get(&pdev->dev);
>>   	if (IS_ERR(emc->bpmp))
>> -		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(emc->bpmp), "failed to get BPMP\n");
>> +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(emc->bpmp),
>> +				     "failed to get BPMP\n");
>>   
>>   	emc->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "emc");
>> -	if (IS_ERR(emc->clk)) {
>> -		err = PTR_ERR(emc->clk);
>> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get EMC clock: %d\n", err);
>> -		goto put_bpmp;
>> -	}
>> +	if (IS_ERR(emc->clk))
>> +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(emc->clk),
>> +				     "failed to get EMC clock\n");
> 
> I see now that we dropped a 'put_bpmp' here and we should not have. I 
> see this is in -next, do you want fix up or I can send a patch?

Great thanks!

Best regards,
Krzysztof