From: Shawn Wang <shawnwang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>, fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
jamie@nuviainc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/resctrl: Clear the stale staged config after the configuration is completed
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 16:22:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86fc22a2-e779-b7ab-67d6-a3aff975ae56@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff44b0ff-6adb-3bae-d17e-4c341c09df5d@intel.com>
Hi Reinette,
On 10/21/2022 12:35 AM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
...
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>>>> index 1dafbdc5ac31..2c719da5544f 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>>>> @@ -338,6 +338,8 @@ int resctrl_arch_update_domains(struct rdt_resource *r, u32 closid)
>>>> msr_param.high = max(msr_param.high, idx + 1);
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> + /* Clear the stale staged config */
>>>> + memset(d->staged_config, 0, sizeof(d->staged_config));
>>>> }
>>>> if (cpumask_empty(cpu_mask))
>>>
>>> Please also ensure that the temporary storage is cleared if there is an
>>> early exist because of failure. Please do not duplicate the memset() code
>>> but instead move it to a common exit location.
>>>
>>
>> There are two different resctrl_arch_update_domains() function call paths:
>>
>> 1.rdtgroup_mkdir()->rdtgroup_mkdir_ctrl_mon()->rdtgroup_init_alloc()->resctrl_arch_update_domains()
>> 2.rdtgroup_schemata_write()->resctrl_arch_update_domains()
>>
>> Perhaps there is no common exit location if we want to clear staged_config[] after every call of resctrl_arch_update_domains().
>
> I was referring to a common exit out of resctrl_arch_update_domains().
>
> Look at how resctrl_arch_update_domains() behaves with this change:
>
> resctrl_arch_update_domains()
> {
> ...
>
> if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_mask, GFP_KERNEL))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> ...
> list_for_each_entry(d, &r->domains, list) {
> ...
> memset(d->staged_config, 0, sizeof(d->staged_config));
> }
>
>
> ...
> done:
> free_cpumask_var(cpu_mask);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> The goal of this fix is to ensure that staged_config[] is cleared on
> return from resctrl_arch_update_domains() so that there is no stale
> data in staged_config[] when resctrl_arch_update_domains() is called
> again.
>
> Considering this, I can see two scenarios in the above solution where
> staged_config[] is not cleared on exit from resctrl_arch_update_domains():
It may not be enough to just clear staged_config[] when
resctrl_arch_update_domains() exits. I think the fix needs to make sure
staged_config[] can be cleared where it is set.
The modification of staged_config[] comes from two paths:
Path 1:
rdtgroup_schemata_write() {
...
rdtgroup_parse_resource() // set staged_config[]
...
resctrl_arch_update_domains() // clear staged_config[]
...
}
Path 2:
rdtgroup_init_alloc() {
...
rdtgroup_init_mba()/rdtgroup_init_cat() // set staged_config[]
...
resctrl_arch_update_domains() // clear staged_config[]
...
}
If we clear staged_config[] in resctrl_arch_update_domains(), goto
statement for error handling between setting staged_config[] and calling
resctrl_arch_update_domains() will be ignored. This can still remain the
stale staged_config[].
I think maybe it is better to put the clearing work where
rdtgroup_schemata_write() and rdtgroup_init_alloc() exit.
(Sorry, I mistakenly wrote rdtgroup_init_alloc() to
rdtgroup_mkdir_ctrl_mon() in my last reply.)
Thank you,
Shawn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-21 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-09 8:36 [PATCH v2] x86/resctrl: Clear the stale staged config after the configuration is completed Shawn Wang
2022-10-11 23:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-10-20 5:55 ` Shawn Wang
2022-10-20 16:35 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-10-21 8:22 ` Shawn Wang [this message]
2022-10-21 18:05 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-10-24 2:31 ` Shawn Wang
2022-10-24 16:45 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-10-25 15:30 ` Shawn Wang
2022-10-25 19:34 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-10-26 11:03 ` Shawn Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86fc22a2-e779-b7ab-67d6-a3aff975ae56@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=shawnwang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jamie@nuviainc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox