From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/13] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow userspace to limit the number of PMCs on vCPU
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 19:19:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86sf6142x0.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJHc60yGk2Gfh-GRtOE94NS0K968iGTfn_3SSMYXxbgKaA_+Pg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 18:58:19 +0100,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 6:09 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 22:40:40 +0100,
> > Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > The goal of this series is to allow userspace to limit the number
> > > of PMU event counters on the vCPU. We need this to support migration
> > > across systems that implement different numbers of counters.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > I've gone through the initial patches, and stopped before the tests
> > (which I usually can't be bothered to review anyway).
> >
> > The comments I have a relatively minor and could be applied as fixes
> > on top if Oliver can be convinced to do so. Note that patch #4 has an
> > attribution issue.
> >
> > > base-commit: 0a3a1665cbc59ee8d6326aa6c0b4a8d1cd67dda3
> >
> > maz@valley-girl:~/hot-poop/arm-platforms$ git describe 0a3a1665cbc59ee8d6326aa6c0b4a8d1cd67dda3
> > fatal: 0a3a1665cbc59ee8d6326aa6c0b4a8d1cd67dda3 is neither a commit nor blob
> >
> > Can you please make an effort to base your postings on a known, stable
> > commit? A tagged -rc would be best. but certainly not a random commit.
> >
> I usually do base on a known -rc. But this series needed a couple of
> series from kvmarm/next (mentioned in the original patch), and hence I
> rebased on top of them.
Well, that commit has since disappeared, as git cannot find it (as
demonstrated above). Which is why I insist on a public tag as a base,
as everything else is completely volatile.
> How do you suggest I handle this in the future? Rebase to a known
> -rc on mainline, apply the required series, and then my series on
> top?
No. You base your own series on an -rc (ideally, -rc3). If there is a
conflict with another series, it is our job (Oliver and I) to fix it
(bonus points if you indicate a resolution for the conflict in the
cover letter).
If there is a hard dependency (something that would actively prevent
your series from working at all), you cherry-pick the minimal set of
patches that makes your own series functional as a *prefix*, and post
the whole thing, including the patches you depend on. Oliver and I
will make sure the common prefix is dealt with without duplication.
And for what it is worth, this series directly applies on v6.6-rc3
without a conflict.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-23 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-20 21:40 [PATCH v8 00/13] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow userspace to limit the number of PMCs on vCPU Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-20 21:40 ` [PATCH v8 01/13] KVM: arm64: PMU: Introduce helpers to set the guest's PMU Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-23 15:24 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-10-20 21:40 ` [PATCH v8 02/13] KVM: arm64: PMU: Set the default PMU for the guest before vCPU reset Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-23 10:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-23 18:24 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-23 15:25 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-10-20 21:40 ` [PATCH v8 03/13] KVM: arm64: PMU: Add a helper to read a vCPU's PMCR_EL0 Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-23 16:18 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-10-20 21:40 ` [PATCH v8 04/13] KVM: arm64: PMU: Set PMCR_EL0.N for vCPU based on the associated PMU Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-23 11:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-23 16:20 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-10-24 9:22 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-20 21:40 ` [PATCH v8 05/13] KVM: arm64: Add {get,set}_user for PM{C,I}NTEN{SET,CLR}, PMOVS{SET,CLR} Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-23 12:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-23 17:28 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-24 8:59 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-20 21:40 ` [PATCH v8 06/13] KVM: arm64: Sanitize PM{C,I}NTEN{SET,CLR}, PMOVS{SET,CLR} before first run Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-23 12:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-23 17:42 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-23 18:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-20 21:40 ` [PATCH v8 07/13] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow userspace to limit PMCR_EL0.N for the guest Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-23 13:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-23 17:53 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-24 18:37 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-20 21:40 ` [PATCH v8 08/13] tools: Import arm_pmuv3.h Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-20 21:40 ` [PATCH v8 09/13] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce vpmu_counter_access test Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-20 21:40 ` [PATCH v8 10/13] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for implemented counters Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-20 21:40 ` [PATCH v8 11/13] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for unimplemented counters Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-24 18:29 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-20 21:40 ` [PATCH v8 12/13] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU test for validating user accesses Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-20 21:40 ` [PATCH v8 13/13] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU test for immutability Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-24 10:36 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-23 13:09 ` [PATCH v8 00/13] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow userspace to limit the number of PMCs on vCPU Marc Zyngier
2023-10-23 17:58 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-23 18:19 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-10-23 18:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-24 19:21 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-25 0:01 ` Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86sf6142x0.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).