From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Fan Wu <fanwu01@zju.edu.cn>
Cc: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>,
Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>,
Varka Bhadram <varkab@cdac.in>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ieee802154: cc2520: fix FIFOP work use-after-free
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 14:36:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871pc6rw34.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260809021917.102947-1-fanwu01@zju.edu.cn> (Fan Wu's message of "Sun, 9 Aug 2026 02:19:17 +0000")
Hi,
On 09/08/2026 at 02:19:17 GMT, Fan Wu <fanwu01@zju.edu.cn> wrote:
> The FIFOP interrupt handler queues cc2520_fifop_irqwork. On removal,
> cc2520_remove() only flushes the work. The devm-managed FIFOP IRQ
> remains active until after ->remove() returns and can queue the work
> again after that flush, allowing it to run after the private data is
> released.
>
> Disable the work with disable_work_sync() instead of flushing it, so
> the handler can no longer queue it once removal begins. Destroy
> buffer_mutex last, since unregistering can invoke the driver's stop
> callback, which uses it.
>
> Install the SFD IRQ before cc2520_register(), so it is available when
> the netdev becomes visible. Install the FIFOP IRQ afterwards, so a
> registration failure cannot schedule RX work while its hardware is
> being released; cc2520_register() no longer frees the hardware on its
> own failure, leaving that to the probe cleanup.
This is a cleanup mixed with a fix. These must be two different patches,
because I don't think you need the cleanup for the fix to make sense.
Thanks,
Miquèl
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-10 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-09 2:19 [PATCH v2] ieee802154: cc2520: fix FIFOP work use-after-free Fan Wu
2026-08-10 12:36 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871pc6rw34.fsf@bootlin.com \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fanwu01@zju.edu.cn \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan@datenfreihafen.org \
--cc=varkab@cdac.in \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox