From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF3371D5147; Wed, 9 Apr 2025 18:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744223413; cv=none; b=NyND5QJjx8bPSv3px7qP3s291xXs3gWI1qccjul/ms/ePPZvvcmlamBhA8ughUBnKqKkiVNSw24NIiwkfuszF73o09Z0NvcR0VDHbzlRC0UP+ezWOzlM8njiLwTlGpqXQPDd7s+ujIOuE52DEuCiYcbUu0hsHHcx4tzaVstzyLY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744223413; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tGFsw14h5OeAVPFvddaRLvoSsBytpqgiiZL6EnjAReI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=F1v2QgPdQVOl9+yL4s8/W7748RS97PLEOicUa2noo1v/AVbyWNUx1vY/X7WYFjy51n3ytpUCPfwuVrhCF+yh63kS+ugVB8JWCk3TxO5R53eeZEayxloW9Ojt5Yn85VCGNInbdQVQVJEKCL4c8ZUZZkNkkmy6unW3pLVcczm+1z0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=fK0d6nCx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="fK0d6nCx" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 7A4D941062 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1744223401; bh=YNhDsA6EC7tTNuxyu13gmMdxXJtGkKEH8Eh077Q3IuU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=fK0d6nCxjR0dClz3TBGivw/S3vHppeH5H/vI2WJBnaEGTcwMO9ZZomxQ+gIv+djxz kr7J3dc6Pf6WOv6CPOlDaxoL40xyyeo7htCPr5mOZW1mZGwlnR57jFY9yFkBdywDWU MToPyOFQcS+KfxUvZaFG5Tsi5hv9oI8OEzU3iNG3c87wVpbyFgV+i+S3wcGl+amb/R J85GtZfTip67TgHXfW+j7sUWi8RLDWCyJ15+bLgC+s3IB6TdWXesbYN5VlzWIqADxR 605K9QQMZQ7sbRGO325QLb1mPgx4Xb9UrOmIGLXcxHi1tol7AQa37sksBWPjtGKbOT hbwhEHwKlTgsQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9:67c:16ff:fe81:5f9b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A4D941062; Wed, 9 Apr 2025 18:30:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Kees Cook , Russell King , linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/33] Implement kernel-doc in Python In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 12:30:00 -0600 Message-ID: <871pu1193r.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > This changeset contains the kernel-doc.py script to replace the verable > kernel-doc originally written in Perl. It replaces the first version and the > second series I sent on the top of it. OK, I've applied it, looked at the (minimal) changes in output, and concluded that it's good - all this stuff is now in docs-next. Many thanks for doing this! I'm going to hold off on other documentation patches for a day or two just in case anything turns up. But it looks awfully good. Thanks, jon