From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F14F4271800; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739372965; cv=none; b=RcPMgCJgzbZu1N20tnrkzmhkAsx9Oy9Dd4MhZiNq+6sZcr9y1lXJ3iH0Z0eAo+xHOh0FDF79CsFJnyjIj7WiZ/hnCPJwdOxcDWyNoOAnN1DdWQf1rOoXCXnY9yEGo0uqJeO2Oy9zSGkk6LxhzdY0E5RhJowN9NBRUVFVRaAf/Ts= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739372965; c=relaxed/simple; bh=s3eO8v8XSBK+TZeF1RJzMOrNTjuDMAawnfOErWRYpDI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uhY3/pnvExG+WvPfdNEG4GgRzS2/IAqb2062cPMrejpk6lPOiJ6cT9Up76nelZJGihuxH8XtQCk3SF7hJIUcnwCkVTkyO1r1qgVXAFM6Rlp4Ifb2wOQUf1XRTgsfroUhucbzmoluMcamR/yWW0rqCUKLlBJNZ9eM8nyYyNS3xXY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=I9P9KuuA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="I9P9KuuA" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net EA9E2411AD DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1739372963; bh=s3eO8v8XSBK+TZeF1RJzMOrNTjuDMAawnfOErWRYpDI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=I9P9KuuA2jhcYtzD42L5khNM19/Yyp/bOukIlGuw0/J5h77rziXgyvFlaHsclyj61 1q+GiioqmdDuX83TcGg6cM9Ud3w0Ab4J6n48WWCjmU1zVbjweyufFICATBNEA6y2LL yzSgpLYkmaAk0wbzCTw00redyWC6VcnzX6QBHk+LUtm0ipN5XyP8OQYcUgT7AJHJV6 vfbBRUnZ38MTyTWe7b4GlExDE1nZZ4/JrPgqhMrHvzs0EP9W46kHQKCpMK4W5OouOo GdpqkXC/7fUIZz+rD848a4PjFYaFRArCdzq9naNkL/Zc6Su293uln2YHG7dcN6rFo3 tn6Q32AKuJRMw== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA9E2411AD; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:09:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the jc_docs tree In-Reply-To: <20250212155253.5bf0513a@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20250212155253.5bf0513a@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:09:22 -0700 Message-ID: <871pw3urml.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi all, > > After merging the jc_docs tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) > produced these warnings: > > WARNING: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/physical_package_id is defined 2 times: Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-devices-system-cpu:27; Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu:70 > WARNING: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/ppin is defined 2 times: Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-devices-system-cpu:89; Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu:70 > > I am not sure what introduced these warnings, but I am guessing Mauro's > changes have exposed them - the two Documentation files above have not > changed since my last build. Exactly - the situation has been there for who knows how long, it's just that we're hearing about it now. Thanks, jon